employee from 01.01.2012 to 01.01.2025
g Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDC 343.112
Introduction. Modern domestic criminal proceedings are faced with many unresolved problems of a theoretical and law enforcement nature. Among the fundamental ones is the problem of normative legal regulation of criminal procedural relations. A paradoxical situation has emerged in which, on the one hand, a claim is rightly made against the criminal procedure legislation about the overload of the criminal procedure form, its difficulty in implementation, and on the other hand, the volume of the regulatory legal field is increasing, which reinforces the already tense situation of maintaining legality in the criminal justice system. It is obvious that traditional approaches to the normative legal regulation of criminal procedural relations no longer allow for the progressive development of criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the search for new ways to optimise the regulation of these legal relations becomes particularly relevant. Individual judicial regulation for criminal proceedings is also a new category. Its use, as well as theoretical research, is mainly carried out in other areas of legal knowledge. Nevertheless, the essence of this category is associated with both the content and the form of judicial criminal procedure activities, which allows us to count on the potential for individual judicial regulation to have a positive impact on solving existing problems in the field of judicial activity. Methods. The research utilised core traditional scientific methodologies, such as the dialectical approach, analysis (including systemic analysis), synthesis, deduction, and modeling. Conclusions. 1. Individual judicial regulation is one of the aspects of the manifestation of the idea of individualisation in criminal proceedings. An essential characteristic of judicial criminal procedural activity is its targeted (individualised) nature. Judicial activity is individualised at the level of both the content of the results and the form of implementation. 2. Individual judicial regulation in criminal proceedings is an element of the court’s legal influence on the subjects of criminal procedural relations, effected through court decisions of a criminal procedural nature on substantive and procedural matters within the competence of the court that meet the requirements of the criminal procedural law. Any court decision (on substantive and procedural issues) must meet the requirement of individualisation. Forms of judicial activity are based on an individualised approach. We believe that the development of the theoretical foundations of individual judicial regulation will ensure the effective resolution of many law enforcement problems, including creating the necessary prerequisites for effective judicial criminal procedure activities in the absence or incompleteness of regulatory control, including procedural rules.
criminal proceedings, individual judicial regulation, criminal procedure form, purpose, form of judicial activity, court decision
1. Polikashina O. V. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti po st. 322.3 UK RF v svyazi so sposobstvovaniem raskrytiyu prestupleniya // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2022. № 1. S. 24–27. https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4152-2022-1-24-27
2. Gerasenkov V. M. Kriterii differenciacii uskorennogo dosudebnogo proizvodstva kak osnova formirovaniya ego effektivnoy modeli // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2019. № 6. S. 21–25.
3. Lebedev V. M. Sudebnaya praktika i razvitie zakonodatel'stva / Zakonodatel'stvo Rossii v XXI veke : Po materialam nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Moskva, 17 oktyabrya 2000 g. Moskva : Gorodec-izdat, 2002. S. 42–51.
4. Larionov P. A. Kontekstnye ogranicheniya ugolovno-pravovoy interpretacii // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k «Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu». 2023. № 1. S. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.34076/22196838_2023_1_35
5. Hromenkov I. R., Kachalova O. V. Obespechenie sudom pravovyh interesov v dosudebnyh stadiyah rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva : monografiya. Moskva : Prospekt, 2023. 176 s.
6. Gorshenev V. M. Ponyatie metoda pravovogo regulirovaniya i ego raznovidnosti // Sbornik uchenyh trudov. Sverdlovsk : Sredne-Ural'skoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1966. Vyp. 5. S. 388–415.
7. Kashanina T. V. Individual'noe regulirovanie v pravovoy sfere // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1992. № 1. S. 122–130.
8. Reutov V. P. Pravotvorchestvo kak pravoprimenitel'nyy process: sootnoshenie normativnogo i individual'nogo / Normativnoe i individual'noe v pravovom regulirovanii: voprosy teorii i praktiki : Materialy VII mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Moskva, 16–20 aprelya 2012 g. / red. V. M. Syryh, S. A. Rubanik. Moskva : RAP, 2013. S. 56–64.
9. Gumerov L. A. Vidy individual'nogo regulirovaniya pravootnosheniy v nauchno-tehnologicheskoy sfere // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2021. T. 12, № 1. S. 8–14. https://doi.org/10.37973/KUI.2021.95.71.001
10. Minnikes I. A. Elementy individual'nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya v semeynom prave // Semeynoe i zhilischnoe pravo. Moskva : Yurist, 2007. № 5. S. 16–20.
11. Mirskaya T. I. K voprosu o sootnoshenii kollektivnosti i individual'nosti v soderzhanii sub'ektivnyh prav cheloveka / Pravovoe i individual'noe regulirovanie obschestvennyh otnosheniy: problemy teorii i praktiki : materialy IX Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii aspirantov, soiskateley, magistrantov i molodyh uchenyh, g. Moskva, 25 aprelya 2018 g. / otv. red.: V. N. Vlasenko, V. M. Duel'. Moskva : RGUP, 2021. S. 105–109.
12. Minnikes I. V. Razvitie idei individual'nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya v sovetskoy i rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. № 1 (46). S. 55–59.
13. Minnikes I. A. Individual'noe pravovoe regulirovanie kak samostoyatel'nyy vid pravovogo regulirovaniya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. № 2 (50). S. 19–25.
14. Minnikes I. A. Individual'nye pravovye akty (k probleme individual'nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya) // Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2006. № 5. S. 59–62.
15. Kachalova O. V., Hromenkov I. R. Obespechenie sudom pravovyh interesov v dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Pravosudie. 2023. № 1. S. 177–192. https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2023.1.177-192
16. Ershov V. V. Individual'noe sudebnoe regulirovanie // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. 1986. № 6. S. 9–17.
17. Lazarev S. V. Sudebnoe upravlenie dvizheniem dela. Moskva : Statut, 2022. 330 s.
18. Bibilo V. N. Normativnoe i nenormativnoe regulirovanie v genezise pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam / Pravo i demokratiya : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Minsk : Pravo i ekonomika, 1999. Vyp. 10. S. 284–296.
19. Tumenova A. A. Priroda individual'nogo regulirovaniya obschestvennyh otnosheniy / Pravovoe i individual'noe regulirovanie obschestvennyh otnosheniy: problemy teorii i praktiki : materialy IX Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii aspirantov, soiskateley, magistrantov i molodyh uchenyh, Moskva, 25 aprelya 2018 g. Moskva : Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya, 2021. S. 52–57.
20. Alekseev S. S. Sovetskoe pravo kak sistema : Metodologicheskie principy issledovaniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1974. № 7. S. 11–18.
21. Sycheva O. A. Taktika sudebnogo sledstviya : monografiya. Ul'yanovsk : Vektor-S, 2012. 240 s.
22. Kuznecov P. Ustanovlenie poryadka issledovaniya dokazatel'stv po ugolovnym delam // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2003. № 8. S. 43–44.
23. Belkin A. R. Processual'nye tonkosti postanovleniya prigovora // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2022. № 2. S. 13–27. https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4411-2022-2-13-27
24. Karpov K. N. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie itogovyh processual'nyh resheniy ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. 2024. T. 21, № 1. S. 63–74. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-1-63-74
