employee
Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
UDC 159.99
UDC 343.955
Introduction. In Russian society, a decrease in the number of offences committed by minors, as well as crimes against minors, has been stated. At the same time, the relevance of the problem of maladaptation of minors having been involved in criminal events, either as participants, victims or witnesses, remains important and significant both in theoretical and practical terms. The problem of maladaptation of minors as parties in criminal proceedings is observed in all forms of subjectivity: suspect/ defendant, victim, witness. The phenomenon of maladaptation, its types and levels, as well as its intensity depend on the ratio and coherence of the external actor and internal readiness for maladaptive processes. In psychological terms, maladaptation affects regulatory processes. The criminal event is an actor of maladaptation of a victim and witness. The maladaptation affects the understanding and realisation of the guilt for the criminal act committed, the content and consequences of the criminal event. Purpose of the research. The research is aimed at: determining the correlation of self-regulation processes with age and individual readiness to understand the guilt as an event and consequence; identifying the signs of manifestation, content and methods of diagnosing the social defect of a minor as a consequence of his participation in a criminal event; developing the requirements for methods and techniques of forensic psychological examination of minors; developing a model of a psychologist’s activity as a specialist in criminal proceedings to support the rights and interests of a minor; determining the status, content and means of an expert-psychologist’s activity to assess the reliability of the testimony of minor participants involved in criminal proceedings. Research methods. The research was based on information analysis and empirical examination. Results. A number of conclusions were drawn and a few promising research tasks were formulated on the basis of the research findings.
maladaptation, social defect, self-directed regulation, reliability of testimony, minor, criminal psychology
1. Andrienko, Yu. V. (2001). V poiskah ob"yasneniya rosta prestupnosti v Rossii v perekhodnyj period: kriminometricheskij podhod. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal VSHE, 5 (2), 194–220.
2. Antonyan, Yu. M. (2022). Otchuzhdenie lichnosti kak prichina prestupnosti. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2 (80), 8–19.
3. Baranov, A. M., Korobkova, E. E. (2024). Uchastie psihologa pri proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam s uchastiem nesovershennoletnih (postanovka problemy). Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo yuridi-cheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 1 (66), 5–10.
4. Vaske, E. V. (2010). Psihologicheskij analiz povedencheskogo reagirovaniya v yuridicheski znachimyh situaciyah nesovershennoletnih poterpevshih po polovym prestupleniyam. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal, 3 (11). http://psystudy.ru
5. Veklenko, S. V. (2008). Znachenie kategorij dialektiki dlya poznaniya viny v ugolovnom prave. Nauchnyj vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii, 2 (29), 44–48.
6. Veklenko, S. V. (2024). Prezumpciya viny v ugolovnom prave Rossii. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2 (102), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2024-2-131-136
7. Garbatovich, D. A., Klassen, A. N. (2017). Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij po motivu i celi. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 17 (3), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.14529/law170302
8. Gauhman, L. D. (2001). Kvalifikaciya prestuplenij: zakon, teoriya, praktika. Moskow: Centr YurInfoR.
9. Dozorceva, E. G., Afanas'eva, A. G. (2015). Ocenka dostovernosti svidetel'skih pokazanij nesovershennoletnih. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya, 4 (3), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2015040306
10. Engalychev, V. F., Koroleva, E. A., Aleksandrova, O. V. (2023). Novye podhody k primeneniyu special'nyh psihologicheskih znanij pri rassledovanii prestuplenij protiv polovoj neprikosnovennosti, sovershennyh nesovershennoletnimi. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 31 (4), 610– 618. https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-1238.2023.31(1-4).4.610-618
11. Zautorova, E. V. (2018). K voprosu o prichinah dezadaptacii lichnosti nesovershennoletnih. Shkola Nauki, 6 (6), 30–31.
12. Kamenskaya, V. G., Tomanov, L. V. (2022). Cifrovye tekhnologii i ih vliyanie na social'nye i psihologicheskie harakteristiki detej i podrostkov. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya, 15 (1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150109
13. Kapinus, O. S. (red.) (2019). Osobennosti proizvodstva sledstvennyh dejstvij s uchastiem nesovershennoletnih poterpevshih i svidetelej: voprosy teorii i praktiki: sbornik materialov seminara (Moskva, 14 noyabrya 2018 goda). Moskow: Universitet prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii.
14. Karmanovskij, M. S. (2010). K voprosu o pravovom statuse svidetelya kak poterpevshego ot prestupnyh posyagatel'stv. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 3 (47), 79–81.
15. Karpova, A. V., Mihajlova, Yu. A., Chizhova, D. S. (2019). Vozmozhnosti psihologicheskogo analiza pokazanij nesovershennoletnih svidetelej i poterpevshih v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Psihologiya i pravo, 9 (4), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090413
16. Kirsanova, T. A., Tertychnaya, I. V. (2021). Ponyatie poterpevshego i svidetelya v ugolovnom prave. Evrazijskaya advokatura, (1 (50)), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.52068/2304-9839202150134
17. Konopkin, O. A. (2005). Strukturno-funkcional'nyj i soderzhatel'no-psihologicheskij aspekty osoznannoj samoregulyacii. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2 (1), 27–42.
18. Kotelevcev, N. A. (2019). Opredelenie sub"ekta i sub"ektnosti v otechestvennoj psihologicheskoj nauke. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (51), 208–212.
19. Lipunova, O. V. (2015). Vzaimosvyaz' urovnya sub'ektivnogo kontrolya i dominiruyushchih zashchitnyh mekhanizmov u deviantnyh podrostkov. Nauka i mir, 4-2(20), 113–115.
20. Pancyr', S. N., Novgorodceva, A. P. (2013). Lichnostnye osobennosti podrostkov s deviantnymi formami povedeniya. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya, 9 (2), 64–72.
21. Petrovskij, A., Petrovskij, V. (2014). Kategoriya lichnosti (k postroeniyu ontologicheskoj modeli lichnosti). Razvitie lichnosti, (2), 58–91.
22. Rudenskij, E. V. (2020). Sub"ektnaya viktimnost' lichnosti podrostka kak uyazvimost' zhiznesposobnosti: fenomenologiya, gnoseologiya i ontologiya. SMAL'TA, (3), 32–40.
23. Safuanov, F. S., Makushkin, E. V. (2017). Ekspertnaya psihologo-psihiatricheskaya diagnostika sposobnosti k samoregulyacii obvinyaemyh i poterpevshih po delam o psihicheskom vozdejstvii. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya, (3), 6–17.
24. Semenova, K. G. (2024). Social'no-psihologicheskaya dezadaptaciya podrostkov: tipologiya i vzaimosvyaz' s sistemoj cennostnyh orientacij. Vestnik prakticheskoj psihologii obrazovaniya, 21 (1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.17759/bppe.2024210109
25. Sitkovskaya, O. D. (2019). Psihologicheskie osnovy doprosa svidetelya. V D. V. Sochivko (Red.), Psihologiya XXI veka: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya: sbornik materialov Vserossijskogo simpoziuma psihologov (Ryazan', 05 aprelya 2019 goda, str. 1002–1012). Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noj sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanij.
26. Tarhanov, I. A., Gajfutdinov, R. R. (2020). Sub"ektivnaya storona prestupleniya i otrazhenie ee priznakov v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 162 (2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2020.2.161-176
27. Fominyh, E. S. (2014). Psihologicheskie mekhanizmy viktimnosti. Nauchno-metodicheskij elektronnyj zhurnal "Koncept", (5), 116–120.
