Moscow, Russian Federation
Introduction. The study, some of the results of which are presented in this article, examined the issues of humanization and liberalization of the criminal legislation of Russia. The authors came to the conclusion about the positive infl uence of these processes on the development of criminal policy. At the same time, a warning was formulated about the negative consequences of their uncontrolled course. Attention is drawn to the growing interest in the legal science to the phenomenon of «expectation». Its interdisciplinary nature is emphasized, its criminal-legal nature is demonstrated using the example of the regulatory provisions of the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Methods. The study was conducted using a number of scientifi c methods: analysis, abstraction, generalization, comparative legal method, statistical method. Results. Based on the analysis of the composition of criminal legal relations, a conclusion is made that expectations are its element and are on a par with other elements – subjective rights and legal obligations. The need to protect legitimate expectations from being frustrated due to extraneous errors by providing the person being released with the right to directly or indirectly apply for such release is emphasized.
Criminal legal relations, subjective rights and legal obligations, criminal-legal expectations; protection of criminal-legal expectations.
1. Kravchenko I.O. Liberalizatsiya i gumanizatsiya ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021. T. 15. № 5. C. 565-577.
2. Petryanina O.A. Gumanizatsiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2018. № 4 (44). S. 236-239.
3. Aleksandrova A.V. Liberalizatsiya ugolovnogo nakazaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2019. № 3 (50). S. 26-31.
4. Popov V.I. «Bol'shaya» korruptsiya i liberalizatsiya ugolovnoy politiki // Ugolovnoye sudoproizvodstvo: problemy teorii i praktiki. 2018. № 1. S. 66-72.
5. Yadrikhinskiy S.A. Doktrina zakonnykh ozhidaniy v nalogovykh otnosheniyakh // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy. 2018. № 4 (17). S. 76-84.
6. Arapov N.A. Fidutsiarnoye gosudarstvo i pravomernyye ozhidaniya (na osnove printsipa podderzhaniya doveriya): Monografi ya. SPb, 2020. 374 s.
7. Podshivalov T.P. Veshchno-pravovyye ozhidaniya kak osnovaniye primeneniya veshchnykh iskov // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2021. № 4. S. 102-123.
8. Chernovol K.A. Kontseptsiya pravomernykh ozhidaniy: yevropeyskiy i rossiyskiy opyt // Pravovedeniye. 2019. № 1. S. 181-191.
9. Kolevatova V.R. Estoppel' i doktrina zakonnykh ozhidaniy: obshcheye i razlichnoye // Molodoy uchonyy. 2023. № 40 (487). S. 212-215.
10. Yefremov Ye.N. Printsip «estoppel'» v sovremennom grazhdanskom prave Rossii: osnovnyye polozheniya i osobennosti primeneniya // Gumanitarnyye i politiko-pravovyye issledovaniya. 2018. № 1. S. 34-41.
11. Nogina O.A., Ovsyannikov S.V. Zashchita zakonnykh ozhidaniy nalogoplatel'shchika v usloviyakh deystviya i primeneniya antiuklonitel'nykh nalogovykh pravil: balans chastnykh i publichnykh interesov // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2022. T. 13. Vyp. 1. S. 83-106.
12. Dvoretskiy M.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovyye otnosheniya i posledstviya v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya i realizatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2016. № 2. S. 190-196.
13. Bystrikov A.M. Ugolovno-pravovyye otnosheniya v kontekste primeneniya srokov davnosti privlecheniya k ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki. 2019. № 13. S. 184-191.
14. Chistyakov A.A., Chistyakov K.A. Strukturnost' ugolovno-pravovogo otnosheniya v mekhanizme formirovaniya pravomernogo povedeniya // Chelovek: prestupleniye i nakazaniye. 2015. № 4 (91). S. 88-93.
15. Knyazeva O.V. Voprosy soderzhaniya ugolovnykh pravootnosheniy // Pravovyye i nravstvennyye aspekty funktsionirovaniya grazhdanskogo obshchestva. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii. CH. 1. Cheboksary, 2020. S. 356-361.
16. Kozlova Ye.L., Barinova Ye.D. Sudebnyy shtraf kak mera osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2021. № 4. S. 8-11.
