Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 159.9 Психология
Family and personality are like a two-faced Janus in human life. History knows periods of patriarchal family, and periods of liberation from family ties. They have always been accompanied by an ideology justifying such modus vivendi. The family, like the state, is necessary for a person to create conditions for development, to protect, to provide communication with the outside world. Today, the family needs support. The reasons and means of such necessity are the main issues of the article. The article characterises the functions of modern family, clarifies the essence of the notion of “safe-type personality”, “safe-type family” and considers the conditions of their formation. The means of protection are diverse, and among them the means of education and coercive measures are habitual. There has always been a connection between these regulators of impact on the family, which weakens and strengthens now and then. Neglect of legal norms and reliance on education (psychology of behavior in the family) or vice versa lead to deviant behavior, therefore a system of measures is needed. The forms of state coercion vary, but typicalislaw, including criminal law. To curb the negative impact on the family, the article proposes a set of measures, including: 1) psychological and pedagogical formation of a “safe-type family”, 2) criminal-legal, as the addition of several articles to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Article 1231 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Coercion to artificial termination of pregnancy”; Article 1491 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Discrediting the family and family values”; Article 1561 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Coercion to enter into or dissolve the marriage”; as well as the inclusion of additional qualifying characteristics in the current articles in the following chapters of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: chapters 16–20, 25 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
family, personality, safe-type personality, safe-type family, family upbringing styles, family values, legal means of family protection
1. Andreev, V. L. (2011). Napravleniya realizacii ugolovnoj politiki v sfere ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany interesov sem'i i nesovershennoletnih. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 1 (49), 71–75.
2. Argajl, M. (2003). Psihologiya schast'ya (per. s angl.). Saint Petersburg: Piter.
3. Burlakov, V. N. (2020). K voprosu o celesoobraznosti zakona o domashnem nasilii. V D. V. Sochivko (red.), Psihologiya XXI veka: vyzovy, poiski, vektory razvitiya: cbornik materialov Vserossijskogo simpoziuma psihologov s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Ryazan', 09-10 aprelya 2020 goda, str. 550–552). Ryazan': Akademiya prava i upravleniya Federal'noj sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanij.
4. Burlakov, V. N., Plotkina, L. N. (2023). Pedagogicheskie, psihologicheskie i pravovye osnovy sohraneniya i ukrepleniya tradicionnyh rossijskih duhovno-nravstvennyh cennostej. V R. M. Kashapov (sost.), Aktual'nye voprosy obespecheniya nacional'noj bezopasnosti: materialy II Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Sankt-Peterburg, 7 dekabrya 2023 g., str. 150–156). Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskaya akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta.
5. Vishnevskij, A. G. (2014). Demograficheskaya revolyuciya menyaet reproduktivnuyu strategiyu vida homo sapiens. Demograficheskoe obozrenie, 1 (1), 6‒33.
6. Eliseeva, A. A. (2022). Sem'ya i semejnye cennosti: podhody k ponimaniyu v usloviyah sovremennogo prava. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava, 17 (3), 67–74.
7. Zobov, V. A. (2017). Zashchita instituta sem'i v kontekste ugolovno-pravovoj ohrany zhizni i zdorov'ya. Otechestvennaya yurisprudenciya, 2 (5 (19)), 39–40.
8. Kashkina, E. V. (2024). Ugolovno-pravovaya ohrana «krepkoj sem'i» kak elementa tradicionnyh rossijskih duhovno-nravstvennyh cennostej. Rossijskij sud'ya, 5, 24–27.
9. Makarov, A. N., Davlitova, L. M. (2019). Ukreplenie instituta sem'i na urovne municipal'nyh obrazovanij. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta.
10. Mal'cev, V. V., Mal'cev, A. F. (2008). Sushchnost', struktura i soderzhanie ponyatiya «lichnost' bezopasnogo tipa. V Kul'tura bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti: aktual'nost', problemy, perspektivy: ezhekvartal'nyj sbornik nauchnyh i uchebno-metodicheskih rabot fakul'teta bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti. Ekaterinburg: Ural. gos. ped. un-t.
11. Mackovskij, M. S. (1989). Sociologiya sem'i. Problemy teorii, metodologii i metodiki. Moskow: Nauka.
12. Nekommercheskoe partnerstvo «Sankt-Peterburgskij mezhdunarodnyj kriminologicheskij klub» (2020). Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo kriminologicheskogo kluba, 2 (57).
13. Rimashevskaya, N. M. (1997). Rol' sem'i v usloviyah social'nyh transformacij. Moskow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN.
14. Tyrnova, N. A. (2005). Molodaya sem'ya v sovremennoj Rossii: problemy i tendencii razvitiya: dis. kand. sociol. nauk. Moskow.
15. Harakteristika razlichnyh tipov semej i ih osobennostej (2019, 6 marta). Obrazovatel'nyj portal Nauka. Club. URL: https://nauka.club/obshchestvoznanie/tipy-semej-i-ix-xarakteristika.html.
16. Harlamov, V. S. (2014). Otechestvennyj i zarubezhnyj opyt protivodejstviya kriminal'nomu nasiliyu v sem'e: monografiya. Saint Petersburg.
17. Harchev, A. G. (1995). Sem'ya i brak. Moskow: Statistika.
18. Huzhina, O. N. (2023). Tradicionnye duhovno-nravstvennye cennosti v rossijskom prave: postanovka nauchnoj problemy. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii, 3 (63), 39–43.
19. Chuprina, A. A. (2015). Sem'ecentrizm rossijskogo obshchestva kak al'ternativa modernizacionnym processam social'nogo bytiya v ekzistencial'no-aksiologicheskom izmerenii. KANT, 3 (16), 44–47.
20. Shestakov, D. A. (2003). Semejnaya kriminologiya = Family criminology: Family criminology: Kriminofamilistika, 2-e izd. Saint Petersburg: Yurid. centr Press.
