St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Introduction. The purpose of the study is to examine the current norms of Russian legislation relating to the protection of creditors' rights. The special emphasis is given to the instruments of criminal law aimed at protection from criminal actions set forth in Art. 176, 177 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The analysis of the effectiveness of these legal mechanisms and their ability to satisfactorily provide protection will make it possible to formulate recommendations for solving the identified problems. Introduction. The aim of the research is to study the current norms of the Russian legislation concerning the protection of creditors' rights. The special emphasis is given to the instruments of criminal law aimed at protection from criminal actions set out in Art. 176, 177 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. An analysis of the effectiveness of these legal mechanisms and their ability to satisfactorily provide protection will make it possible to formulate recommendations for solving the identified problems. Provision of protection from illegal actions of borrowers in the context of criminal legislation may imply not only the application of penalties, but also the implementation of incentive measures. In the author's opinion, the post-criminal behaviour of a person is aimed at restoring the violated rights of creditors, which is also implemented through exemption from criminal liability. The latter has not found support in practice, but could be implemented through the addition of a note containing more effective measures to incentivise persons who agree to voluntarily compensate for damage caused by an offence. Methods. The basis for this work is the dialectical method applied to the analysis of social processes and phenomena considered in the study. The key methods were the methods of analysis and comparison. Among others, the methods of synthesis, formal-legal, logical, cause-and-effect relations, etc. were used. Results. The proposals formulated in this article are aimed at the formation of effective protection of creditors' rights, which are violated by borrowers in the framework of committed offences under Art. 176, 177 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Attention is drawn to the application by some foreign countries of liability for cases of concealment of information about events entailing termination of loan repayment. It is suggested to take into account this action as rational for the protection of creditor's rights.
breach, borrower, defence, lender, exemption from liability, withholding information
1. Loginov, D. M. Uroven' zhizni i finansovye praktiki rossijskoj molodezhi / D. M. Loginov // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ekonomiki. – 2020. – № 3(8). – S. 32-47. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24411/2587-7666-2020-10302. – EDN MLHHBC.
2. SHigalugova, M. H. K voprosu o protivodejstvii nezakonnym vydacham potrebitel'skih kreditov v Rossijskoj Federacii / M. H. SHigalugova // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve. – 2022. – T. 15, № 4. – S. 234-237. – EDN MYYAQQ.
3. Ustinova, K. A. Analiz predprinimatel'skoj deyatel'nosti s pozicij stimulov i bar'erov / K. A. Ustinova // Problemy razvitiya territorii. – 2022. – T. 26, № 6. – S. 165-184. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2022.6.122.10. – EDN NJPCAS.
4. Bavsun, M. V. (Ne)ravenstvo grazhdan pered ugolovnym zakonom / M. V. Bavsun // Nauchnyj vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii. – 2018. – № 1(68). – S. 3-7. – EDN YURZVZ.
5. Antonov, A. G. K voprosu o repressivnosti osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti v svyazi s vozmeshcheniem ushcherba / A. G. Antonov // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pedagogika, psihologiya i pravo : Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii k 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora Aleksandra L'vovicha Remensona - yurista, uchenogo-penitenciarista, pedagoga, osnovatelya Tomskoj shkoly ispravitel'no-trudovogo (ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo) prava, Tomsk, 27–28 aprelya 2023 goda. Tom Vypusk 11. – Tomsk: Federal'noe kazennoe uchrezhdenie dopolnitel'nogo professional'nogo obrazovaniya "Tomskij institut povysheniya kvalifikacii rabotnikov Federal'noj sluzhby ispolneniya nakazanij", 2023. – S. 28-30. – EDN MOZGVM.
6. Kashapov, R.M. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: obzor sudebnoj praktiki // Lobbirovanie v zakonodatel'stve. 2022. T. 1. № 1. S. 47–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33693/2782-7372- 2022-1-1-47-50.– EDN XGWMAM.
7. Budylin, N. V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti v svyazi s vozmeshcheniem ushcherba (CH. 2 ST. 76.1. UK RF): gumanizaciya zakonodatel'stva / N. V. Budylin // XI yuridicheskie chteniya. Lichnost', obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v usloviyah global'nyh transformacij: yuridicheskij vzglyad i pravovye resheniya : Sbornik statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 160-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayushchegosya yurista A.F. Koni, 135-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vidnogo yurista i sociologa P.A. Sorokina, 30-letiyu Konstitucii Respubliki Komi, Syktyvkar, 04–06 aprelya 2024 goda. – Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. Pitirima Sorokina, 2024. – S. 43-49. – EDN ARUQDB.
8. Kirillova, YA. M. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa: analiz sudebnoj praktiki / YA. M. Kirillova // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. – 2023. – T. 14, № 2. – S. 371-388. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.206. – EDN HBZUHQ.
9. Novikova, E. V. Sudebnyj shtraf: diskussiya prodolzhaetsya / E. V. Novikova // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). – 2022. – № 10(98). – S. 44-52. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.98.10.044-052. – EDN NMHNOM.
10. Zarubin, A. V. Nekotorye problemy sudebnoj praktiki osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa / A. V. Zarubin // Ugolovnaya politika i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika : sbornik materialov VIII-j Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 30–31 oktyabrya 2020 goda. – Sankt-Peterburg: Centr nauchno-informacionnyh tekhnologij "Asterion", 2020. – S. 107-113. – EDN UTQZLY.
11. Lapshin, V. F. Sudebnyj shtraf kak ugolovno-pravovaya mera gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya / V. F. Lapshin // Vestnik YUgorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2021. – № 3(62). – S. 99-104. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17816/byusu20210399-104. – EDN RGITGU.
12. Zvecharovskij, I. E. Vozmeshchenie ushcherba ot prestupleniya kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti / I. E. Zvecharovskij, N. V. Kandybko // Baikal Research Journal. – 2023. – T. 14, № 2. – S. 710-714. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2023.14(2).710-714. – EDN AJGEPG.
13. Bagautdinov, F. N. Sudebnyj shtraf: paradoksy sudebnoj praktiki / F. N. Bagautdinov, M. F. Mingalimova // Mirovoj sud'ya. – 2019. – № 6. – S. 22-27. – EDN ZELYTA.
14. Esakov, G. A. Sudebnyj shtraf v sudebnoj praktike i statistike: sovremennye tendencii / G. A. Esakov, O. V. Gejnce // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2023. – № 11(159). – S. 25-38. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.52390/20715870_2023_11_25. – EDN JFSUNO.
15. Tolkachenko, A. A. Mezhotraslevye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya sudebnoj praktiki primeneniya sudebnogo shtrafa (v svyazi s zakonoproektom ob ugolovnom prostupke) / A. A. Tolkachenko // Rossijskoe pravosudie. – 2018. – № S1. – S. 178-186. – EDN YVJMHZ.
16. Sitnikova, A. I. Zakonodatel'no-tekstologicheskij podhod k primechaniyam statej glavy 22 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii / A. I. Sitnikova // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. – 2020. – № 1(49). – S. 161-168. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2020-1-161-168. – EDN PMJNYU.
17. SHihanov, V. N. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti po primechaniyam k stat'yam Osobennoj chasti UK RF / V. N. SHihanov // Zakonnost'. – 2020. – № 2(1024). – S. 41-45. – EDN NGFCUN.
