St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 159.9 Психология
Introduction. During a person’s life, a "type of temporality of his personality" is formed (by himself and/or by circumstances), which determines everyday and work activity. The problem of the study is the answers the questions: is it possible to describe the types of temporality of personality based on temporal orientation and temporal scenario? Are there some differences in time attitude, its functions, and the dominant orientation of adaptive activity in subjects with different types of temporality? Research methods. The respondents were 355 representatives of socionomic professions, aged 27 to 35 years (180 women and 175 men). Psychodiagnostic methods were the author’s developments: the questionnaire "Subjective assessment of temporal orientation," the scale "Temporal scenario of personality," the methodology "Scale of subjective attitude to time," the questionnaire "Temporality of personality," the questionnaire "Subjective assessment of adaptive activity of personality." Results. Resourceful, neurotic-fixed and infantile-fixed types of personality temporality are revealed. "Resourceful type" - a combination of a resolving temporal scenario with a focus on the present and future, with a flexible attitude to time, which performs a mobilizing function and a pragmatic orientation of adaptive activity as well. "Neurotic-fixed type" is a combination of a forbidding temporal scenario, with fixation on the past, a temporal dependence, where time has subject-limiting and suppressing functions, with a homeostasis orientation of adaptive activity. "Infantile-fixed type" is a combination of infantile-resolving temporal scenario with a fixed focus on the present, indifferent attitude to time, performing a limiting function for the subject and hedonism as the leading orientation of adaptive activity.
temporality, attitude, scenario, time functions, adaptive activity
1. Abul’hanova, K. A., Berezina, T. N. (2001). Vremya lichnosti i vremya zhizni: monografiya. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya.
2. Vechkanova, E. M. (2014). Specifika vremennoj perspektivy lichnosti pri razlichnyh urovnyah perezhivaniya krizisa identichnosti. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (60) (2), 117-122.
3. Golovaha, E. I., Kronik, A. A. (1984). Psihologicheskoe vremya lichnosti. Kiev: Naukova Dumka.
4. Gor’kaya, Zh. V. (2014). Sociokul’turnyj analiz psihologii vospriyatiya vremeni. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 9 (120), 245-250.
5. Gurova, O. S. (2019). Osobennosti vremennoj perspektivy lyudej s hronicheskimi zabolevaniyami. Zdorov’e cheloveka, teoriya i metodika fizicheskoj kul’tury i sporta, 5 (5 (16)), 14-24. URL: http://hpcas.ru/article/view/7216
6. Duhnovskij, S. V. (2021). Shkala «Otnoshenie k vremeni»: psihometricheskaya harakteristika i vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya. Lichnost’: resursy i potencial, 4 (12), 59-66.
7. Duhnovskij, S. V., Mishchenko, V. A., Mironov, A. V. (2022). Lichnostnye harakteristiki pedagogov zrelogo vozras¬ta s raznym otnosheniem ko vremeni. Severnyj region: nauka, obrazovanie, kul’tura, 1 (49), 39-46. https://doi. org/10.34822/2312-377X-2022-1-39-46
8. Duhnovskij, S. V., Zaikin, A. V. (2023). Osobennosti vremennoj napravlennosti sub”ektov perezhivayushchih i neperezhivayushchih bezopasnost’. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 28 (2 (93)), 133-138. https://doi. org/10.24412/1999-6241-2023-293-133-138
9. Zabelina, E. V. (2018). Vremya v vospriyatii sovremennoj molodezhi: otrazhenie kul’tury postmodernizma. Gumanitarnye nauki, 4 (44), 17-23.
10. Zimbardo, F., Boĭd, Dzh. (2010). Paradoks vremeni. Novaya psihologiya vremeni, kotoraya uluchshit vashu zhizn’: isprav’ Proshloe, naslazhdajsya Nastoyashchim i upravlyaj Budushchim. Saint Petersburg: Rech’.
11. Klochko, V. E., Krasnoryadceva, O. M, Hvan, N. V. (2015). Individual’no-psihologicheskie harakteristiki dvuh tipov hronotipicheskoj organizacii zhiznennogo mira cheloveka. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (63) (3), 148-154.
12. Kovalev, V. I. (1995). Osobennosti lichnostnoj organizacii vremeni zhizni. V Gumanisticheskie problemy psihologicheskoj teorii: sbornik statej (str. 179-184). Moskow: Nauka.
13. Kravcova, Ya. V., Dubovickaya, T. D., Abdullin, A. G. (2020). Psihologicheskoe vremya i samoeffektivnost’ lichnosti. Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya, 13 (3), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps200302
14. Petrovskij, V. A. (1992). Psihologiya neadaptivnoj aktivnosti. Moskow: TOO «Gorbunok».
15. Pecherskaya, S. A. (2014). Psihologicheskoe vremya kak psihologicheskij aspekt zdorov’ya lichnosti. Vestnik Universiteta, 21, 292-297.
16. Chevrenidi, A. A. (2019). Osobennosti vremennoj perspektivy u rukovoditelej raznogo dolzhnostnogo urovnya. Organizacionnaya psihologiya, 7 (1), 83-96.
17. Yanickij, M. S., Seryj, A. V., Braun, O. A., Balabashchuk, R. O. (2021). Hronotopicheskie harakteristiki obraza mira v situacii pandemii COVID-19. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 23 (2), 466-476. https://doi. org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-2-466-476
18. Yanichev, P. I. (2007). Psihologiya otrazheniya i perezhivaniya vremeni: aktual’nye problemy. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena, 42, 7-20.
19. Reisch, L. A. (2001). Time and Wealth. Time & Society, 10(2-3), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X01010002012
20. White, L. T., Valk, R., & Dialmy, A. (2011). What Is the Meaning of “on Time”? The Sociocultural Nature of Punctuality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42 (3), 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110362746
