Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.15 Конституционное (государственное) право
Digital era creates new opportunities for citizens for participation in political and legal decision-making process at various levels. Currently, the practice of involving citizens in drafting of laws and even constituent acts is spreading in foreign countries. The draft of the Constitution of Iceland of 2011 was adopted by the Constitutional Council, which included ordinary citizens, not representatives of the political elite. By the use of social media and the official website, the Council was able to establish direct contacts with the population and promptly respond to suggestions and comments of citizens. Not only citizens, but also foreigners could submit their proposals on issues which should be reflected in the text of the Constitution, comments on the wording of certain articles and participate in the stress test of the constitutional draft. This approach has legitimized the process of the Constitution drafting and created a sense of ownership among those who participated in the discussion. Although this draft has not become the Constitution because of the lack of the Parliament’s support, the Iceland’s experience may be interesting as a new approach to drafting laws in the digital era. The Icelandic experience was considered unprecedented and revolutionary. It showed that the process of Constitution drafting could be more open and democratic without incur-ring significant financial costs.
constitution, amendments, constituent assembly, referendum, digital tools
1. Simoncini A. The Constitutional Dimension of the Internet. Some Research Paths // Eu-ropean University Institute Working Paper. - Law. - 2016/16. - 13 p.
2. Palermo F. La “manutenzione costituzionale”: alla ricerca di una funzione // La “Manutenzione” Costituzionale / A cura di F. Palermo. - Padova: CEDAM, 2007 - 520 p.
3. Landemore H. Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment //The Journal of Political Philosophy. - 2015. - Vol. 23.- No. 2. - P. 166 -191.
4. Eerola A., Reuchamps M. Constitutional Modernisation and Deliberative Democracy: A Political Science Assessment of Four Cases // Revue interdisciplinaire d’etudes jurid-iques. - 2016. - Vol. 77. - No. 2. - P. 319-336.
5. Gluck J., Ballou B. New Technologies in Constitution Making. Special Report // United States Institute of Peace. - URL: https:// www.usip.org/publications/2014/04/new-technologies-constitutionmaking (data obrascheniya: 13.04.2019).
6. Árnason A.Th. A Review of the Icelandic Constitution - Popular Sovereignty or Political Confusion // Tijdschrift voor constitutioneel recht. - 2011. - No. 3. - P. 342-351.
7. Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. A Review of Iceland’s Draft Constitution // The Com-parative constitutional Project. October 14, 2012. - URL: http://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/wp-content/ uploads/CCP-Iceland-Report. pdf?6c8912 (data obrascheniya: 21.06.2019).
8. Ólafsson J. An Experiment in Iceland: Crowdsourcing a Constitution? // Academia. edu. - URL: https://www.academia.edu/1517443/Experiment_in_Iceland_Crowdsourcing_a_Constitution (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).
9. Oddsdóttir K. Iceland: the Birth of the World’s First Crowd-Sourced Constitution?// Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. - 2014. - Vol. 3. - Is. 4. - P. 1207-1220.
10. Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306 _Crowdsourcing_ Democracy_The_Case_of_Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).
11. Gylfason T. Crowds and Constitutions // VOX CERP Policy Portal. 13 October 2011. - URL: https:// voxeu.org/article/crowds-and-constitutions-insights-iceland (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2019).
12. Bani M. Crowdsourcing Democracy: the Case of Icelandic Social Constitutionalism // ResearchGate. - URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256030306_Crowdsourcing_Democracy_ The_Case_of_ Icelandic_Social_Constitutionalism (data obrascheniya: 21.04.2019).
13. Gylfason T., Meuwese A. Digital Tools and the Derailment of Iceland’s New Constitution // CESifo Working Paper No. 5997. - Category2: Public Choice. - July 2016.
14. Hudson A. E. Does Public Participation Really Matter? The Case of Iceland’s Crowdsourced Constitution // URL: https://www.academia.edu/35091728/ Does_Public_Participation_Really_Matter_The_Case_of_Icelands_Crowdsourced_Constitution (data obrascheniya: 19.01. 2019).
15. Suteu S. A New Form of Direct Democracy: Constitutional Conventions in Digital Era. University of Edinburg. Research Paper Series. No. 2014/39 // SSRN. - URL : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511285 (data obrascheniya: 12.06. 2019).
16. Thorarensen B. Why the Making of a Crowd-Sourced Constitution in Iceland Failed // Constitution Making&Constitutional Change. - URL: https://constitutional-change.com/why-the-making-of-a-crowdsourced-constitution-in-iceland-failed (data obrascheniya: 15.04.2019).
17. Samu A. Could Romania’s Selfie Go Viral? Economic Feasibility of Using Digital Tools in the Constitutional Law Democratic Process // Procedia Economics and Finance. - 2015. - Vol. 32. - P. 623-624.
