Kaliningrad, Kalinigrad, Russian Federation
The article raises the question of the need for a more complete professional orientation of the content of the academic discipline «Rhetoric», which implies the exclusion of purely philological sections from the educational program and the expansion of sections focused on the study of genres necessary in the future professional activity of cadets. At the same time, genres are necessarily described according to the same scheme in accordance with the genre model, since in this case students get the opportunity to see similarities and differences between them. Two typical ways of describing the system of genres required by a specialist are proposed. The first is that genres are grouped into groups necessary to perform certain functions of an employee. The second approach consists in a comparative description of genres that are similar in meaning.
Academic discipline, teaching methods, rhetoric, rhetorical competence, training program, speech competence of a specialist, genres of speech
1. Anisimova T.V., Gimpel'son E.G. Rechevaya kompetenciya menedzhera. M.: MPSI, 2007. 480 s.
2. Bahtin M.M. Problema rechevyh zhanrov // Bahtin M.M. Literaturno-kriticheskie stat'i. M.: Hudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986. S. 428-473.
3. Gajda St. ZHanry razgovornyh vyskazyvanij // ZHanry rechi-2. Saratov, 1999. S. 103-112.
4. Lotman YU.M. Ritorika // Ritorika. 1995. № 2. S. 92-108.
5. Obshchaya ritorika / ZH. Dyubua, F. Edelin, ZH.-M. Klinkenberg, F. Menge, F. Pir, A. Trinon [per. s fr. E.E. Razlogovoj i V.P. Narumova]. M.: Progress, 1986. 392 s.
6. Salagaev V.G. Professional'naya ritorika v vuze // YAzykoznanie. 2015. № 3 (59). S. 96-102.
7. Tarasov A.A., SHaripova A.R. Ritorika dlya yuristov: Uchebnik. M.: YUsticiya, 2017. 244 s.
8. Teoreticheskie osnovy PR-ritoriki: Monografiya / Anisimova T.V., Aksenova A.V., Muhina M.V., Ryzhenko E.S. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2014. 367 s.
9. Perelman Ch., Olbrehts-Tyteca L. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. London: Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame Univ. Press, 1969. 566 p.
