The article examines the provisional measure of procedural coercion in the form of seizure of property. The norms of criminal procedural legislation regulating the procedure for applying this measure of coercion, the positions of scientists on related debatable issues, materials of judicial practice are considered. Argues own point of view regarding the essence of the seizure of property. The author considers the attachment of property to the number of procedural actions that are of a security and restorative nature. In order to specify the norms of criminal procedural legislation, it is proposed to change the wording of Article 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.
Arrest of property, measure of procedural coercion, preliminary investigation, criminal proceedings
1. Iskandirov V.B. Nalozhenie aresta na imushchestvo v ugolovnom processe: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2012. 22 s.
2. Habibova L.D. Nalozhenie aresta na imushchestvo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennosti: nauka i obshchestvo. 2020. № 3 (28). S. 20-22.
3. Dikarev I.S. Problemy nalozheniya aresta na imushchestvo v ugolovnom processe // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 4. S. 81-85.
4. SHadrin V.S. Obespechenie prav lichnosti pri rassledovanii prestuplenij. M.: YUrlitinform, 2000. 232 s.
5. Bulatov B.B., Dezhnev A.S. Novelly zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya sroka nalozheniya aresta na imushchestva // Rossijskij sledovatel'. 2016. № 1. S. 8-13.



