employee
Volgograd, Russian Federation
UDC 343.101
Annotation. Introduction. In the course of the study, the results of which are presented in the article, the author analyzed the theoretical and practical issues arising in understanding the concept of criminal procedural acts of the prosecutor. Particular attention is paid to the legal nature of these acts, their classification and place in the system of criminal procedural documents. Methods. The methodological basis of the study was formed by a set of general scientific and specific scientific methods. The methods of analysis and synthesis, the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, the method of interpretation of law, systemic-structural, empirical, formal-legal, and comparative-legal methods were used. Results. The author comes to the conclusion about the relevance of conducting scientific research dedicated to the problems arising in connection with the activities of the prosecutor's office in issuing criminal procedural acts. The need to improve its legislative regulation is stated. Approaches to understanding the functions of the prosecutor, the implementation and registration of his procedural decisions formed in criminal procedural science are analyzed. The concepts of «criminal procedural acts of the prosecutor» and «acts of prosecutorial response» are compared and distinguished. A classification of criminal procedural acts of the prosecutor is provided, their legal nature and role in the mechanism of legal regulation are defined. An analysis of the theoretical and practical problems arising in connection with the issuance of criminal procedural acts is conducted. Proposals by several academic authors for the normative consolidation of new types of criminal procedural acts of the prosecutor are considered. The study concludes that a systematic approach is needed to define the role of the prosecutor as the entity empowered to issue and approve criminal procedural acts, which determines their key role in ensuring the legality and effectiveness of criminal proceedings.
Prosecutor, prosecutorial authorities, criminal procedural acts, prosecutorial response acts, prosecutor's orders, criminal prosecution, procedural powers
1. Dikarev I.S. Spornyye voprosy organizatsii dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2016. № 5. S. 27-30.
2. Yevdokimov V.B., Ul'yanov A.Yu. Printsip effektivnosti i yego realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti prokuratury kak instituta publichnoy vlasti s osobym statusom // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2024. № 506. S. 193-200.
3. Spirin A.V. Protsessual'naya deyatel'nost' organov doznaniya. Yest' li neobkhodimost' v «prokurorskoy opeke»? // Vestnik Ural'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 3. S. 56-61.
4. Manova N.S. Model' deyatel'nosti prokurora kak osnova reformirovaniya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Aktual'nyye problemy sudebnoy, pravookhranitel'noy, pravozashchitnoy, ugolovno-protsessual'noy deyatel'nosti i natsional'noy bezopasnosti: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Krasnodar: Kubanskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2022. S. 337-345.
5. Bykov V.M. Storona obvineniya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: Monografiya. M.: Yurayt, 2025. 172 s.
6. Kuz'min R.G. Ispolneniye sledovatelem pis'mennykh ukazaniy prokurora kak obyazatel'noye usloviye povtornogo napravleniya ugolovnogo dela prokuroru // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2024. № 2 (55). S. 51-59.
7. Grinenko A.V. Vzaimodeystviye sledovatelya i prokurora v novykh pravovykh realiyakh // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 4 (73). S. 147-153.
8. Rossinskiy S.B. Obvinitel'noye zaklyucheniye: aktual'nyye problemy formy i soderzhaniya // Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2024. № 3 (106). S. 100-109.
9. Denisov Ye.A. Ponyatiye «sledstvennyye dokumenty»: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz zakona, nauki i praktiki // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2024. № 5. S. 95-99.
10. Bulanova N.V. Uchastiye prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M., 2018. 108 s.
11. Terekhin A.A. Klassifikatsiya aktov prokurorskogo reagirovaniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2010. № 3 (24). S. 209-214.
12. Kolomeyets Ye.V. Klassifikatsiya aktov prokurorskogo reagirovaniya, primenyayemykh v ugolovnom dosudebnom proizvodstve // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2017. № 1 (50). S. 228-231.
13. Byzova M.V. Ponyatiye i sootnosheniye aktov prokurorskogo nadzora i aktov prokurorskogo reagirovaniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2008. № 3 (6). S. 70-73.
14. Sitnik V.V. Teoreticheskiye aspekty prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniyem zakonov organami, osushchestvlyayushchimi doznaniye // Aktual'nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2018. № 4 (89). S. 185-194.
15. Samoletov S.N. Problemnyye voprosy izmeneniya prokurorom obvineniya: sushchnost' i sovremennoye sostoyaniye // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2023. T. 13. № 12-1. S. 239-246.
16. Terekhin A.A. Apellyatsionnyye i kassatsionnyye predstavleniya kak akty prokurorskogo reagirovaniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 2012. № 4 (33). S. 160-165.
17. Antonov D.O. Primeneniye sovremennykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v rabote organov prokuratury // Tsifrovyye tekhnologii v prokurorskoy deyatel'nosti: Sbornik materialov konferentsii. M., 2024. S. 16-19.
