doctoral candidate from 01.01.2005 until now
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDC 343
UDC 346.9
Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the observed tendency of increasing number of cases of misappropriation of assets belonging to strategic enterprises engaged in water biological resource collecting (fishing). Despite the significant damage caused to the state by malicious foreign entities, there are no precedents for bringing those responsible to criminal justice for violations of foreign investment legislation. Is this phenomenon due to the lack of public danger posed by the unauthorised “seizure” of Russian strategic enterprises by foreign entities, or is the problem rooted in the imperfection of criminal law? Methods. The methodological basis of the research includes the dialectical method of cognition, general scientific and specific scientific methods, in particular, comparative legal, formal logical and systemic methods. Results. Reasonable grounds have been established indicating that violations of legislation restricting foreign participation in the fishing industry may pose a public danger, causing harm to the state and economic relations. The seizure of assets belonging to fishing enterprises results in the illegal fishing of aquatic biological resources. A comparison of criminal law provisions with the specifics of the aforementioned violation in the field of fishery leads to the conclusion that there are no legal standards providing for criminal liability directly for such a violation. At the same time, the offences analysed in the study do not exclude the possibility of applying other provisions of criminal law to the phenomenon under consideration.
public danger, foreign investment, illegal collection of biological resources, criminal liability, strategic enterprises
1. Sotskov F. N. Ponyatie i suschnost' obschestvennoy opasnosti deyaniya i ee vliyanie na formirovanie norm ugolovnogo zakona Rossii : monografiya Moskva : Rusayns, 2025. 264 s.
2. Neshataev V. N. Obschestvennaya opasnost' kak obschiy priznak prestupleniya i ee rol' v kvalifikacii // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2020. № 1 (38). S. 27–32. https://doi.org/10.51980/2542-1735_2020_1_27
3. Korneev S. A., Golovastova Yu. A. Obschestvennaya opasnost' v sovremennoy doktrine ugolovnogo prava: inversionnye tendencii razvitiya. // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. 2024. T. 15, vyp. 4. S. 993–1011. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.405
4. Alehin V. P., Korzhov D. M. K voprosu ob obschestvennoy opasnosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // STUDNET. 2021. № 2. S. 58–66.
5. Ondar A.-B. S. Obschestvennaya opasnost': problemy opredeleniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2023. T. 18, № 6 (151). S. 85–94. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.151.6.085-094
6. Ahtanina N. A. Obschestvennaya opasnost' kak priznak administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2019. № 6. S. 30–36. https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2019.6.32494
7. Ivanenko I. N., Pen'kova A. L. Razgranichenie administrativnogo pravonarusheniya i prestupleniya // Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta : [setevoe izdanie]. 2017. № 129 (05). S. 866–877. https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-129-062
8. Aleksandrov A. N., Dizer O. A., Nedostupenko T. A. Formirovanie doktrinal'nogo podhoda k obschestvennoy opasnosti kak priznaku prestupleniy i administrativnyh pravonarusheniy // Pravoprimenenie. 2024. T. 8, № 4. S. 93–102. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(4).93-102
9. Hilyuta V. V. Ontologicheskie aspekty ponimaniya obschestvennoy opasnosti kak priznaka prestupleniya // Lex russica. 2024. T. 77, № 2. S. 60–69. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.207.2.060-069
10. Antonova L. B. Pravonarushenie, prestuplenie i obschestvennaya opasnost' // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2023. № 1. S. 256–260.
11. Kachestvo ugolovnogo zakona. Problemy Obschey chasti : monografiya / Klepickiy I. A. [i dr.] ; otv. red. A. I. Rarog. Moskva : Prospekt, 2016. 287 s.
12. Kuznecova N. F. Prestuplenie i prestupnost' // Izbrannye trudy. Sankt-Peterburg : Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2003. 834 s.
13. Bochkarev S. A. O prirode obschestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniya // Biznes v zakone. 2009. № 5. S. 155–159.
14. Osipov I. V., Truncevskiy Yu. V. Kvalifikaciya ekonomicheskih prestupleniy po ocenochnym priznakam : monografiya. Moskva : Prospekt, 2025. 240 s.
15. Ignat'eva M. N., Loginov V. G., Balashenko V. V., Kubarev M. S. Specifika prava sobstvennosti na prirodnye resursy // Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2018. № 3 (51). S. 142–149. https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2018-3-142-149
16. Sidorov S. A., Pinchuk O. V. Aktual'nye voprosy vozniknoveniya prava sobstvennosti na rezul'taty pol'zovaniya vodnymi biologicheskimi resursami // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2019. № 3.S. 28–36. https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2019.3.29411
17. Vinokurov V. I. Ob'ekt prestupleniya: doktrinal'no-prikladnoe issledovanie : monografiya. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. Moskva : Prospekt, 2024. 368 s.
