Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control

Kirill Karpov

UDC

343.272

CSCSTI

10.00

VAK Russia

5.1.4

DIFFERENTIATION OF PROPERTY CONFISCATION AS A CRIMINAL LAW MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Pages 102–109 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

Received: 07.04.2025 Accepted: 25.09.2025 Published: 30.09.2025 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Kirill Karpov

ORCID

Kirill Karpov

Academic degree: candidate of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: docent

Omsk Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia kafedra ugolovnogo prava · Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Problems related to the insufficient effectiveness of the process of property confiscation, as well as the existence of unresolved contradictions in the legal regulation of the seizure of property obtained as a result of committing a crime, require the search for new approaches to determining the grounds and conditions for applying such a measure of a criminal law nature. Considering the process of property confiscation as a means of social control allowing to exclude the possibility of economic profit from committing crimes, makes it possible to fill existing gaps in current legislation and enforcement practice. Methods. The research is based on general scientific methods: synthesis, induction, and generalisation. Using a formal legal method, the norms of domestic criminal legislation regulating the grounds and conditions for applying property confiscation were analysed. Based on the interdisciplinary concept of resource control developed in the fields of corporate and public administration, economics, and management, the author illustrates the possibility of establishing more comprehensive grounds for property confiscation as an alternative measure of a criminal law nature. The method of legal modelling has made it possible to formulate specific proposals for improving the process of property confiscation. Results. In developing the concept of the unacceptability of economic profits from crime committing, the author proposes refusing selective confiscation of incomes from certain offences only and extending confiscation to property obtained as a result of any offence. In addition, the author states the need to exclude unreasonable differentiation in the confiscation of property depending on financial status that implies the profitability of committing crimes using vehicles not belonging to an offender.

KEYWORDS

confiscation, social control, property, grounds for differentiation, responsibility, vehicle

Funding

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Petrov S. V. Metody ugolovno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federacii // Gumanitarnye, social'no-ekonomicheskie i obschestvennye nauki. 2024. № 7. S. 145–148. https://doi.org/10.24412/2220-2404-2024-7-16

2. Kuznecova I. A. Metody ugolovno-pravovoy politiki // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2012. № 11 (25) : v 2-h ch. Ch. I. C. 100–104.

3. Kruglikov L. D., Vasil'evskiy A. V. Differenciaciya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. Sankt-Peterburg : Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2003. 268 s.

4. Lesnievski-Kostareva T. A. Differenciaciya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti : Teoriya i zakonodatel'naya praktika. Izd. 2-e, pere-rab. i dop. Moskva : Norma, 2000. 389 s.

5. Uil'yamson O. I. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma : Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktaciya : [Per. s angl.] / nauch.red. i vstup. st. V. S. Kat'kalo. Sankt-Peterburg : Lenizdat, 1996. 702 s.

6. Kleyner G. B. Resursnaya teoriya sistemnoy organizacii ekonomiki // Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2011. T. 9, № 3. S. 3–28.

7. Sloun A. Moi gody v General Motors. / per s angl.: A. Kozlova, A. Vrublevskogo, V. Karpyuka, Yu. Levchuka [i dr.]. Moskva : Eksmo, 2022. 706 s.

8. Afanas'ev V. G. Nauchnoe upravlenie obschestvom : (Opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya). 2-e izd., dop. Moskva : Politizdat, 1973. 391 s.

9. Luneev V. V. Konfiskaciya imuschestva iz UK RF nezakonno isklyuchena: chto dal'she? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. № 4. S. 5–10.

10. Yani P. S. Konfiskaciya imuschestva i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 6. S. 131–135.

11. Kuznecova O. A., Stepanov V. V. Mezhotraslevaya pravovaya priroda konfiskacii imuschestva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2018. № 2 (254). S. 27–37.

12. Bavsun M. V., Nikolaev K. D., Samoylova S. Yu. Konfiskaciya imuschestva v rossiyskom ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve : monografiya. Moskva : Yurlitinform, 2016. 239 s.

13. Golovanova N. A. Konfiskaciya kak reakciya na korystnoe prestuplenie // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 7 (223). S. 78–86. https://doi.org/10.12737/11754

14. Sheveleva S. V. Konfiskaciya imuschestva kak inaya mera ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyy process. 2019. № 3. S. 73–84.

15. Krasnov Yu. K. Institut konfiskacii imuschestva v ugolovnom prave Rossii uroki bor'by s dohodami, poluchennymi prestupnym putem, v ocenke Verhovnogo suda RF // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2018. № 2 (47). S. 22–30. https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-2-47-22-30

16. Rarog A. I. Institut konfiskacii imuschestva nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii / Institut konfiskacii imuschestva v zakonodatel'stve gosudarstv-chlenov soveta Evropy i v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo seminara, Belokuriha, 3–6 oktyabrya 2007 g. Barnaul : Altayskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2008. S. 53–59.

17. Turicyn A. V. Problema podmeny ponyatiy konfiskaciya (st. 104.1 UK RF) i «iz'yatie imuschestva» po sdelke, sovershennoy s cel'yu, protivnoy osnovam pravoporyadka ili nravstvennosti (st. 169 GK RF), po delam o vzyatochnichestve // Pravo i praktika. 2023. № 3. S. 54–60. https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-2275-2023-3-54-60

18. Goncharova V. A. Konfiskaciya (st. 104.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF) i obraschenie vsego poluchennogo storonami po antisocial'noy sdelke v dohod Rossiyskoy Federacii (st. 169 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF): problemy sootnosheniya i obespecheniya edinoobraziya v primenenii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2024. № 2. S. 89–97. https://doi.org/10.52452/19931778_2024_2_89

19. Karpov K. N. Kogda ne primenyaetsya konfiskaciya imuschestva // Zakonnost'. 2017. № 12 (998). S. 36-40.

20. Mingalimova M. Konfiskaciya transportnyh sredstv kak sposob preduprezhdeniya soversheniya prestupleniy v sostoyanii op'yaneniya // Zakonnost' 2024. № 2. S. 41-47.

21. Sheveleva S. V. Transformaciya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva na sovremennom etape // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2024. T. 28, № 3. S. 106–123. https://doi.org/10.61205/S160565900029134-1

22. Mamatov M. V., Maslov I. A. Konfiskaciya transportnogo sredstva kak element preduprezhdeniya obschestvenno-opasnyh deyaniy v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2019. № 1. S. 66–68.

23. Nadin A. Konfiskaciya transportnyh sredstv: problemy pravoprimeneniya // Zakonnost'. 2024. № 11. S. 55–58.

GOST

Karpov K. N. Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2025. no. 3. pp. 102-109. (Date of access 08.09.2026).

MLA

Kirill Karpov. "Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2025.3 (2025): 102-109.

APA

Karpov K. N. (2025). Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2025(3), 102-109.

Chicago

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Karpov K. N. | title = Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2025 | volume = 2025 | issue = 3 | pages = 102-109 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

DIFFERENTIATION OF PROPERTY CONFISCATION AS A CRIMINAL LAW MEANS OF SOCIAL CONTROL Differentiation of property confiscation as a criminal law means of social control

Confirmation