Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?

Yulia Ozerova; Marina Kirikova

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151

VAK Russia 5.1.4 UDC 344.653

2 more Collapse

IS A SHORTENED FORM OF INQUIRY NECESSARY AS A SEPARATE FORM OF INVESTIGATION? Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Volume 2025, Issue 1 · Pages 146–151 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151

Received: 23.09.2024 Accepted: 20.03.2025 Published: 28.03.2025 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Yulia Ozerova

ORCID

Marina Kirikova

ORCID

Yulia Ozerova

Academic degree: candidate of jurisprudence sciences

Leningrad Regional Branch of St. Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Russian Federation

ORCID

Marina Kirikova

Leningrad Regional Branch of St. Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the article presents different authors' positions on the presence ofthe inquiry in a shortened form as a separate form of preliminary investigationin the criminal process, considers the features of this form of preliminary investigation, its advantages and problematic issues arising in the process of investigation. The comparison is made between the inquiry in a shortened form and foreign police inquiry, as well as the protocol form of inquiry and the inquiry in a shortened form, the author's position on the issue under consideration is presented. Methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction) and specific scientific methods of legal research (historical-legal, systemic, sociological, comparative-legal, statistical, formal-logical). Results. The conducted research shows that inquiry in a shortened form copes with its function, and justifies its expediency as a form of preliminary investigation, but needs further improvement. The directions of improvement are related to the possibility of the application of the inquiry in a shortened form to non-obvious crimes, when a person who committed a crime is established within a reasonable period of time, as well as with the restriction of the rights of the victim and the suspect to change their decision in conducting this type of preliminary investigation. The author's definition of the inquiry in a shortened form is submitted.

KEYWORDS

inquiry, preliminary investigation, a shortened form, abolition, simplified procedure

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Kirikova M. V., Ozerova Yu. S. Institut doznaniya: za i protiv / Sbornik nauchnyh trudov, posvyaschennyy deyatel'nosti nauchnyh shkol Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii i priurochennyy k 25-letiyu so dnya ego obrazovaniya / sost.: O. I. Gorodovaya, O. S. Kravchenko, A. A. Zhavoronkova. Sankt-Peterburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2023.S. 343–348.

2. Boyarskaya A. V. Problemy yuridicheskoy konstrukcii predmeta dokazyvaniya v ramkah sokraschennogo doznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2015. № 1. S. 38–42.

3. Panokin A. M. Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 5 (42). S. 914–918.

4. Runovskiy A. V. K voprosu o sozdanii sokraschennogo doznaniya // «Chernye dyry» v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2011. № 6. S. 123–126.

5. Vlasova N. A. Doznanie v forme polnogo rassledovaniya // Innovacii v nauke: puti razvitiya : materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii / gl. red. M. P. Nechaev. Cheboksary : Ekspertno-metodicheskiy centr, 2018. S. 198–202.

6. Gir'ko S. I., Harchenko S. V., Dolgopolov A. A., Kambarov A. M. Rossiyskoe uskorennoe doznanie: sovremennye metamorfozy processual'noy formy // Penitenciarnaya nauka. 2022. T. 16, № 3 (59). S. 274–284. https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2022.59.3.005.

7. Chepik M. M. Sokraschennoe doznanie kak vid kompromissa v sovremennom ugolovnom processe / Deyatel'nost' pravoohranitel'nyh organov v sovremennyh usloviyah : materialy XIH Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Irkutsk, 29–30 maya 2014 g. Irkutsk : Vostochno-Sibirskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. S. 142–144.

8. Zagor'yan S. G., Kotel'nikova O. A. Sokraschennoe doznanie: nekotorye problemy i puti ih resheniya // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2021. № 2 (97). S. 85–94. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-3184-2021-2-85-94.

9. Sumin A. A. Sokraschennoe doznanie: mertvorozhdennoe ditya reformatorov ugolovnogo processa // Advokat. 2013. № 10. S. 5–8.

10. Zhuravleva N. M. Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudom ugolovnogo dela, rassledovannogo v poryadke gl. 321 UPK RF // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki : sbornik nauchnyh statey, g. Mogilev, 30 aprelya 2021 g. Mogilev : Mogilevskiy institut MVD Respubliki Belarus', 2021. S. 62–66.

11. Matinyan E. A. Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme: suschnost' i problemy // Molodoy uchenyy. 2019. № 46 (284). S. 167–169.

12. Hismatullin I. G. Problemnye voprosy sokraschennoy formy doznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2016. № 3. S. 59–61.

13. Peshkov M. A. Novyy vid predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya – doznanie v sokraschennoy forme // Novyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 2. S. 164–166.

14. Yakimovich Yu. K. Prokuror i sledovatel': processual'noe polozhenie v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 357. S. 148–150.

15. Harzinova V. M. Aktual'nye problemy proizvodstva doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2015. № 5 (55): v 2-h ch. Ch. I. C. 199–202.

GOST

Ozerova Y. S., Kirikova M. V. Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation? // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2024. no. 1. pp. 146-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151. (Date of access 01.10.2026).

MLA

Yulia Ozerova, Kirikova M. V.. "Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2025.1 (2024): 146-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151.

APA

Ozerova Y. S., Kirikova M. V. (2024). Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2025(1), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151

Chicago

Yulia Ozerova, Kirikova M. V.. "Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2025, no. 1 (2024): 146-151. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Ozerova Y. S., Kirikova M. V. | title = Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation? | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2024 | volume = 2025 | issue = 1 | pages = 146-151 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2025-1-146-151 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

IS A SHORTENED FORM OF INQUIRY NECESSARY AS A SEPARATE FORM OF INVESTIGATION? Is a shortened form of inquiry necessary as a separate form of investigation?

Confirmation