Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure

Elena Alekseeva; Andrey Vinogradov

doi:10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64

UDC

343.13

CSCSTI

10.00

Russian Classification of Professions by Education

40.00.00

Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification

Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification

BISAC

LAW027000

VAK Russia

5.1.4

LEGAL TECHNIQUE OF THE NORMS REGULATING THE GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL TO INITIATE A CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND THE GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF A CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure

АА Аа

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Pages 59–64 · Rubric: CRIMINAL LAW SCIENCES

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64

Received: 11.05.2022 Accepted: 03.10.2022 Published: 03.10.2022 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Elena Alekseeva

ORCID

Andrey Vinogradov

ORCID

Elena Alekseeva

Academic degree: candidate of jurisprudence sciences

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia associate professor · Department of Criminal Procedure · Russian Federation

ORCID

Andrey Vinogradov

Academic degree: candidate of jurisprudence sciences

Science rang: docent

Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia Russian Federation

ORCID

ABSTRACT

The article analyzes the criminal procedural problems associated with the legal regulation of the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for terminating a criminal case. The authors note that at present the legislator’s approach to their systematization, as well as the content of individual grounds, are the cause of a number of problems that arise in law enforcement. In this regard, the need to improve these criminal procedure institutions is stated. The purpose of the study is to identify the problems of legal regulation of the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for terminating a criminal case and suggesting possible ways to solve them. To achieve this goal, methods of analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical, formal-legal, comparative-legal research methods were used. In the work, based on legal and technical considerations, it is proposed to separate the grounds for refusing to initiate a criminal case and the grounds for its termination, fixing them in separate articles of the criminal procedure law. Arguments are also given in favor of distinguishing between such grounds as the absence of an event of a crime and the absence of corpus delicti in an act. Based on the analysis, the author proposes a list of grounds for both refusal to initiate a case and grounds for its termination. Conclusions are drawn that the proposals made will contribute to the improvement of the legal technique for presenting these grounds in the criminal procedure law and, as a result, to increase the efficiency of law enforcement activities aimed at implementing the non-punitive aspect of the appointment of criminal proceedings.

KEYWORDS

criminal procedure, criminal justice process, initiation of criminal procedure, termination of criminal procedure, event of crime, elements of crime

Text

Text (PDF)

Read Download

1. Himicheva G. P. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam: koncepciya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti: monografiya. - Moskva: Ekzamen, 2003. - 352 s.

2. Fil'chenko A. P. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ugolovno-pravovoy kategorii «deyanie» i ugolovno-processual'noy konstrukcii «sobytie prestupleniya» // Advokat. - 2014. - № 2. - S. 19-23.

3. Artamonov A. N. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya prestupleniya, otsutstviem v deyanii sostava prestupleniya, neprichastnost'yu podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo k soversheniyu prestupleniya // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. - 2015. - № 1 (34). - S. 71-78.

4. Provotar' Yu. A. Problemy razgranicheniya osnovaniy dlya prinyatiya processual'nyh resheniy ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya i otsutstviem sostava prestupleniya / Krymskie yuridicheskie chteniya. Pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost' : sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. - Simferopol', 8 iyunya 2017 goda. - Simferopol': OOO «Izdatel'stvo Tipografiya «Arial», 2017. - S. 211-214.

5. Mineev Yu. V. Osobennosti prinyatiya resheniya ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya prestupleniya // Nauchnyy daydzhest Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2021. - № 3 (13). - S. 81-85.

6. Barkalova E. V., Stryukova E. N. K voprosu ob opredelenii osnovaniy otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela ili prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela // Voennoe pravo. - 2019. - № 4 (56). - S. 247-254.

7. Mel'nikov A. V. O sravnenii otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh pravil otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ih resheniya. - 2019. - № 3 (25). - S. 141-143.

8. Volynskaya O. V., Grashicheva O. N. Problema razgranicheniya osnovaniya otkaza v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela i ego prekrascheniya v sootvetstvii s p. 4 ch. 1 st. 24 UPK RF // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2017. - № 17. - S. 11-14.

9. Aristarhov A. L. O special'nyh osnovaniyah prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. - 2019. - № 3. - S. 79-84.

10. Dikaev S. U., Dikaeva M. S., Rytchenko A. V., Ponomareva M. A. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo dela po reabilitiruyuschim osnovaniyam v stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Truvor, 2019. - 103 s.

GOST

Alekseeva E. S., Vinogradov A. S. Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure // Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022. no. 3. pp. 59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64. (Date of access 08.09.2026).

MLA

Elena Alekseeva, Vinogradov A. S.. "Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2022.3 (2022): 59-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64.

APA

Alekseeva E. S., Vinogradov A. S. (2022). Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2022(3), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64

Chicago

Elena Alekseeva, Vinogradov A. S.. "Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure." Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2022, no. 3 (2022): 59-64. https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Alekseeva E. S., Vinogradov A. S. | title = Legal technique of the norms regulating the grounds for refusal to initiate a criminal procedure and the grounds for termination of a criminal procedure | journal = Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia | year = 2022 | volume = 2022 | issue = 3 | pages = 59-64 | doi = 10.35750/2071-8284-2022-3-59-64 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

Confirmation