graduate student from 01.01.2024 to 01.01.2025
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
UDC 343.13
Introduction. Detention is the most restrictive preventive-imposed measure. Consequently, it is subject to careful legal regulation. The aim of this regulation is to prevent any ambiguity in the interpretation of criminal procedure rules, and inconsistent judicial practice regarding its selection and application. The present article explores certain issues of the selection and application of detention in pre-trial proceedings during criminal investigations, particularly in the context of inquiry, as well as in relation to the accused (suspects) who possess immunity from criminal prosecution. The issue of the necessity to enhance the criminal procedural norms governing the procedure of imposing this preventive measure on minors has come to the forefront due to recent amendments to Article 108 Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter the CPC RF). Methods. General scientific methods of cognition, such as analysis, deduction, analogy, the systemic-structural method, as well as private scientific methods: the formal-legal and comparative-legal methods were used in this study. The results. The results of the study laid the groundwork for recommendations to revise and amend the explanations issued by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation concerning the determination of the detention period for suspects whose criminal cases are in the form of inquiry. In addition, a proposal was made for the resolution of the legal dispute concerning the procedure for the imposition of detention on persons who are immune from criminal prosecution. In response to recent amendments to the Article 108 Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, a list of exceptional cases that are taken into account by the court when determining the detention of minors who have committed crimes of medium gravity has been developed. It has been conclusively determined that the complete substitution of this preventive measure with alternative measures is not feasible.
preventive measures, judicial procedure of choosing preventive measures, detention, inquiry, suspect, immunity from criminal prosecution
1. Kutuev E. K., Vinogradov A. S., Kolosovich M. S. Sovershenstvovanie mer presecheniya, ogranichivayuschih konstitucionnye prava podozrevaemyh i obvinyaemyh // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2024. № 2 (69). S. 123—129.
2. Nikolyuk V. V. Zaklyuchenie pod strazhu osuzhdennogo, skryvshegosya v celyah ukloneniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya: chto izmenilos' za desyat' let? / Kriminalistika, ugolovnyy process i sudebnaya ekspertologiya v HHI veke: vektory razvitiya (k 70-letiyu kafedry upravleniya organami rassledovaniya prestupleniy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii) : sbornik nauchnyh statey po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii : v 3 ch., g. Moskva, 25 aprelya 2025 g. Moskva : Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2025. Ch. 2. S. 132–142.
3. Sankin V. E. Osobennosti izbraniya mer presecheniya i pred'yavlenie obvineniya pri doznanii / Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i prava na sovremennom etape : sbornik nauchnyh statey po materialam VIII Respublikanskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy Dnyu yurista, g. Sterlitamak, 3 dekabrya 2019 g. Sterlitamak : Bashkirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, Sterlitamakskiy filial, 2019. Vyp. VIII. S. 117–120.
4. Garaev H. F. Aktual'nye problemy pravoy reglamentacii instituta doznaniya / Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya: aktual'nye voprosy i innovacii : sbornik statey XXI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Penza, 10 oktyabrya 2021 g. Penza : Nauka i Prosveschenie, 2021. S. 72–74.
5. Sudnicyn A. B. Obespechenie nadlezhaschego povedeniya obvinyaemogo (podozrevaemogo) putem izbraniya mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu / Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki : materialy XHV mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Krasnoyarsk, 7–8 aprelya 2022 g. / otv.red. D. V. Kim. Krasnoyarsk : Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2022. Ch. 1. S. 126–129.
6. Stel'mah V. Yu. Nekotorye problemy normativnoy reglamentacii doznaniya // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2019.№ 4. S. 58–60.
7. Murav'ev K. V. Zaklyuchenie pod strazhu: rezul'taty dvadcatiletnego sovershenstvovaniya / Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki : materialy XHIV mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Krasnoyarsk, 8–9 aprelya 2021 g. Krasnoyarsk : Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2021.Ch. 1. S. 132-135.
8. Cokolova O. I. Mery presecheniya: problemy i tendencii (2019-2022 gody) // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2020.№ 6. S. 26–31.
9. Murav'ev K. V. 20 let sovershenstvovaniya instituta mer presecheniya: itogi i napravleniya dal'neyshego reformirovaniya // Sovremennoe ugolovno-processual'noe pravo – uroki istorii i problemy dal'neyshego reformirovaniya. 2021. № 1 (3). S. 7–16.
10. Kachalova O. V. Sovremennye podhody k primeneniyu mer presecheniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe// Predvaritel'noe rassledovanie. 2018. № 2 (4). S. 41–47.
11. Zaycev D. S. Osobennosti primeneniya mer prinuzhdeniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik nauchnogo obschestva studentov, aspirantov, molodyh uchenyh. 2024. № 2. S. 80–85.
12. Zalunina T. G. Osobennosti primeneniya mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih / Pravovaya sistema Rossii : sbornik materialov IV zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Blagoveschensk, 25 noyabrya 2016 g. Blagoveschensk : Amurskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2017. S. 62–67.
13. Makarenko I. A. K voprosu o primenenii mery presecheniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 2. S. 85–88.
14. Medvedeva S. V., Mentyukova M. A., Popov A. M. Effektivnost' primeneniya k nesovershennoletnim mer presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu i domashnego aresta // Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i prava. 2023. № 26. S. 319–330. https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-2-319-330
15. Kutuev E. K. Sovershenstvovanie mer presecheniya, ogranichivayuschih konstitucionnye prava podozrevaemyh i obvinyaemyh // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2024. № 2 (69). S. 123–129.
16. Davletov A. A., Azarenok N. V. Zaklyuchenie pod strazhu kak mera presecheniya, primenyaemaya k licu, predstavlyayuschemu ugrozu dlya obschestva // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2024. № 3 (77). S. 140–147. https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2024.3.16
17. Gasanov A. M. Osobennosti primeneniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnego podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo mer presecheniya // Colloquium-journal. 2019. № 16-7 (40). S. 46–47.
18. Murtazin P. M. Primenenie mery presecheniya v vide zaklyucheniya pod strazhu v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. № 3. S. 49–51.
