employee from 01.01.2024 until now
Department for the Organization of Activities of District Police Commissioners and Juvenile Affairs Units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the Kaliningrad Region (UODUUP i PDN UMVD Rossii po Kaliningradskoy oblasti, Chief Inspector for Special Assignments)
from 01.01.2020 to 01.01.2024
Russian Federation
Introduction. At the present stage of development of legal science and criminal legislation, no formal defi nition of the category «degree of public danger of a crime» has been developed, and there is no consensus on its content. In law enforcement practice, this circumstance complicates the process of objectively assessing the public danger of crimes provided for in Art. 156 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (failure to fulfi ll duties to raise a minor). Moreover, there is a confusion of related legal categories and a substitution of concepts, which signifi cantly complicates the procedure for qualifying such crimes. This does not contribute to the uniformity of law enforcement practice. In the study carried out by the author of the article, an attempt was made to formulate scientifi cally substantiated conclusions that would help resolve the problem. Methods. The study summarized the materials of investigative and judicial practice in cases of failure to fulfi ll duties to raise minors, combined with cruel treatment; analyzed the provisions of the current legislation; compared the obtained empirical data. Results. Various situations of failure to fulfi ll duties to raise a minor are considered, their specifi c features are identifi ed in the context of assessing the degree of public danger of crimes provided for in Article 156 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A conclusion is formulated that the degree of public danger of failure to fulfi ll duties to raise a minor is a quantitative assessment criterion used for criminal-legal assessment of the public danger of an act, its content is determined.
Cruel treatment, parenting responsibilities, minor, crime, category of crimes, assessment of public danger, degree of public danger
1. Bachmanova M.O. Vopros ucheta kharaktera i stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti sovershennogo prestupleniya yavlyayetsya diskussionnym v nauke ugolovnogo prava // Uspekhi sovremennogo yestestvoznaniya. 2011. № 8. S. 231-232.
2. Smirnov A.M. K voprosu o kriteriyakh obshchestvennoy opasnosti // Dnevnik nauki. 2018. № 10 // URL: https://www.dnevniknauki.ru/images/publications/2018/10/law/Smirnov.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2025).
3. Solodkov I.A. Soderzhaniye kategorii «stepen' obshchestvennoy opasnosti» // Sovremennaya yuridicheskaya nauka: ot teorii k praktike. Sbornik materialov obshcherossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tambov, 2012. S. 304-311.
4. Ishchenko I.V. Kharakter i stepen' obshchestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniy i neprestupnykh deyaniy: problemy ponyatiya i kriteriyev opredeleniya // Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskiye nauki. 2021. № 3. T. 7 (73). CH. 2. S. 133-147.
5. Mikhal' O.A. Kharakter i stepen' obshchestvennoy opasnosti kak kriteriy klassifi katsii prestupleniy // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Seriya: Pravovedeniye. 2012. № 6 (305). S. 106-118.
6. Khamtakhu R.Sh. Kategoriya obshchestvennoy opasnosti deyaniya v strukture prestupleniya: voprosy elementnoy iyerarkhii i ispol'zovaniya v kachestve kriteriya klassifi katsii prestupleniy // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2014. № 3 (49). S. 125-128.
7. Blagov Ye.V. Primeneniye obshchikh nachal naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: Monografi ya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. 190 s.
8. Bokovnya A.Yu. Ponyatiye i sistema kriteriyev tipovoy stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti lichnosti vinovnogo v sovershenii prestupleniya // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta imeni V.N. Tatishcheva. 2020. № 2 (95). T. 1. S. 156-162.
9. Voronin V.N. Individualizatsiya nakazaniya s uchetom kharaktera i stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2016. № 11. S. 113-122.
10. Yegorova N.A. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' prestupleniya: teoriya, zakonodatel'stvo, sudebnaya praktika // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2019. № 1 (48). S. 8-18.
11. Kondrat'yeva K.Yu. Kharakter i stepen' obshchestvennoy opasnosti sovershennogo prestupleniya kak osnovaniye primeneniya uslovnogo osuzhdeniya // Vestnik Samarskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. 2016. № 1 (19). S. 138-141.
12. Vlasenkova E.A. K voprosu o nakazanii za neispolneniye obyazannostey po vospitaniyu nesovershennoletnego // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. 2023. № 4 (57). S. 23-30.
13. Pudovochkin Yu.Ye. Ponyatiye, kriterii i predely ucheta obshchestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniya sudom // Ugolovnaya politika i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. SPb, 2019. S. 57-67.
14. Pudovochkin Yu.Ye. Otsenka sudom obshchestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniya: Nauchnoprakticheskoye posobiye. M.: RGUP, 2019. 224 s.
15. Fis'kov I.A. O ponyatii i soderzhanii priznaka «obshchestvennaya opasnost'» // Agrarnoye i zemel'noye pravo. 2020. № 10 (190). S. 116-118.
