from 01.01.1999 to 01.01.2023
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 351.745.7 Уголовный розыск. Криминальная полиция
Introduction. The implementation of operational investigative activities by officials of operational investigative activity subjects and persons providing them with confidential assistance objectively requires the concealment of a significant amount of information about themselves, as well as about the operational investigative means and methods they use. However, the objective reality in which operational investigative activities are carried out often does not allow concealing the very fact and circumstances of its implementation. In such conditions, it is tactically more advantageous and rational to disguise the implementation of operational investigative activities under other types of social activity, using for this purpose a covert-conspiratorial toolkit, which includes the so-called cover documents – documents that encrypt the identity of officials, departmental affiliation of enterprises, institutions, organisations, divisions, premises and vehicles of bodies implementing operational investigative activities, as well as the identity of citizens providing them with assistance on a confidential basis. Russian operational-search legislation regulates their use extremely sparingly and illogically, which gives rise to theoretical and practical problems of using this functional-legal institute of operational-search activities. In this work, the author analyses the modern normative legal regulation of this sphere. Methods. The study used general scientific dialectical, comparative legal, formal logical methods and the method of content analysis. This made it possible to identify evidence of a normative legal deficit in terms of regulating the lawful and safe circulation of special chemical substances for operational-search purposes in the prevention, suppression and detection of crimes, and the search for criminals. Results. Based on the analysis of a number of federal laws, inconsistent and contradictory provisions of individual articles designed to regulate the use of cover documents by operational-search activity subjects were identified. This gives rise to a conflict of laws in their legal interpretation and subsequent implementation in practice. The study allowed the author to state a certain inadequacy of the legal regulation of the use of cover documents by operational-search activity subjects and participants and the need for the earliest possible optimisation of the regulatory system in the area under consideration in accordance with the proposed authentic approaches. In conclusion, the author formulates individual proposals for the interpretation of current legal norms and their editorial correction.
operational investigative activity, secrecy, conspiracy, cover documents, legend, legend-making, encryption of identity and departmental affiliation
1. Klimov I. A., Sazonova N. I. Osnovnye sistemoobrazuyuschie ponyatiya teorii operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti i ih rol' v ee formirovanii i konkretizacii // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. – 2008. – № 1. – S. 63–72.
2. Panyushin D. B. Ponyatie legendy v teorii i praktike operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti / Problemy teorii i praktiki operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennih del : mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2009. – Vyp. 6. – S. 129–138.
3. Obrazcov V. A., Bertovskaya N. L. Ugolovno-relevantnoe dezinformirovanie: ponyatie i kriterii dopustimosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2010. – № 2. – S. 112–117.
4. Elisov P. P. Ispol'zovanie operativnoy dezinformacii i inscenirovki pri provedenii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy po vyyavleniyu i dokumentirovaniyu korrupcionnyh prestupleniy: mnenie analitika // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. – 2015. – № 2 (30). – S. 54–60.
5. Omelin V. N. Sootnoshenie operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy i inyh smezhnyh operativno-rozysknyh deystviy // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. – 2016. – № 6. – S. 9–12.
6. Zheleznyak N. S. O neobhodimosti korrektirovki polozhenii stat'i 15 Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» // Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2017. – № 2 (27). – S. 7–12.
7. Rumyancev N. V., Omelin V. N. O pravovoy zaschite grazhdan, sodeystvuyuschih operativno-razysknym organam // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2018. – № 5. – S. 233.
8. Markushin A. G. Operativno-rozysknaya deyatel'nost' – neobhodimost' i zakonnost'. – Nizhniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 1997. – 218 s.
9. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Operativno-rozysknoy instrumentariy : monografiya. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2024. – 304 s.
10. Pavlichenko N. V., Tambovcev A. I. Sredstva operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti kak strukturnaya sostavlyayuschaya ee instrumentariya / Materialy XV nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo foruma Sochinskogo instituta (filiala) RUDN im. Patrisa Lumumby / pod red. V. V. Bobyleva. – Moskva: Pero, 2023. – S. 171–180.
11. Tambovcev A. I. Ponyatie i soderzhanie operativno-rozysknogo instrumentariya v zakone ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti / Materialy XV nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo foruma Sochinskogo instituta (filiala) RUDN im. Patrisa Lumumby / pod red. V. V. Bobyleva. – Moskva: Pero, 2023. – S. 189–199.
12. Pavlichenko N. V. Konspiraciya v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: voprosy teorii : preprint. – Moskva: Izdatel'skiy dom Shumilovoy I. I., 2008. – 47 s.
13. Gusev V. A. Prava operativnyh podrazdeleniy policii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika : monografiya – Moskva: Izdatel'skiy dom Shumilovoy I. I., 2014. – 126 s.
14. Zheleznyak N. S. Voprosy aktualizacii Federal'nogo zakona «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» : monografiya. – Krasnoyarsk: Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2019. – 332 s.
15. Tambovcev A. I. Deviacii kak gipoteticheskaya osnova neglasno-konspirativnogo segmenta operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti (na primere legendirovannyh ob'ektov) // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. – 2023. – № 3 (3). – S. 324–334.
16. Tambovcev A. I. Legendirovannye ob'ekty v operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: sovremennye vozzreniya zakonodateley / Kriminalistika nauka bez granic: tradicii i novacii : materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2024. – S. 385–395.
17. Tambovcev A. I., Pavlichenko N. V. Sodeystvie grazhdan pravoohranitel'nym organam, kak social'no-pravovoy fenomen : monografiya. – Moskva: Prospekt, 2022. – 344 s.
18. Zemskova A. V. Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstvennoy zaschity poterpevshih, svideteley i drugih uchastnikov ugolovnogo processa, a takzhe lic, okazyvayuschih sodeystvie v vyyavlenii, preduprezhdenii, presechenii, raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy / Kontrol' i nadzor za deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennih del – vazhneyshaya garantiya obespecheniya prav cheloveka : materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, g. Moskva, 26–27 oktyabrya 1999 g. / otv. red.: L. Sh. Berekashvili, V. P. Ignatov. – Moskva: Schit-M, 2000. – S. 144.
19. Smushkin A. B. Problemy realizacii zakona «O zaschite svideteley, poterpevshih inyh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» // Nauchnyy obozrevatel'. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 17–19.
20. Hozikova E. S. O garantiyah gosudarstvennoy zaschity svideteley i poterpevshih v Rossii // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 34–40.
