employee from 01.01.2021 until now
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
UDK 343.7 Преступления против имущества
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
OKSO 40.00.00 Юриспруденция
BBK 67408 Уголовное право
TBK 7581 Уголовное право
BISAC LAW LAW
Introduction. The article emphasizes the relevance of criminal law protection of property rights. The article provides a comparative analysis of individual features of the crimes provided for in paragraph “g” of Part 3 of Art. 158 and art. 159.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, some theoretical and applied aspects of the study of these forms of contactless theft are highlighted. A distinction is made between the socially dangerous acts under consideration, including the nature and direction of deception as a method of facilitating access to property, in one case, and as a method of confiscating it, in the second. Not only the main scientific works on a related research topic have been studied, but also judicial practice on the application of criminal legislation in the field of protection of property rights has been summarized. Methods. The methodological basis of scientific research included both general scientific (analysis, synthesis, deduction, generalization, classification, comparison) and private scientific methods (formal legal, method of document analysis and comparative legal). Results. Attention is drawn to cases of reclassification of acts from fraud to theft, and the reasons are analyzed. Criticism of certain provisions on the issues of delimiting the qualifying elements of theft and a special type of fraud is given. Criteria for distinguishing these crimes are proposed.
Theft from a bank account, fraud using electronic means of payment, property, deception, breach of trust, intent, selfish purpose
1. Agafonov, A. V. Peculiarities of perception of the content of the subjective side of crime / A. V. Agafonov, D. O. Kurichkov // Modern science: current problems of theory and practice. Series: Economics and law. – 2023. – No. 9. P. 91-97. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2974.2023.09.02. – EDN LBOLNO.
2. Arkhipov, A.V. Fraud using electronic means of payment (Article 159.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) // Criminal Law. – 2019. – No. 5. P. 16-20. – URL: Legal reference system ConsultantPlus.
3. Veklenko, V.V. Qualification of thefts: Monograph. – Omsk: Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2001. – 256 p.
4. Gribanova, D. V. Fraud using electronic means of payment: “post-June” judicial practice // Analytical Center for Criminal Law and Criminology - URL: https://crimexpert.ru (access date: 11/05/2023).
5. Yelets, E. A., Knyazkina, A. K. Some problems of qualifying thefts (based on the analysis of law enforcement practice) // Business. Education. Right. Bulletin of the Volgograd Institute of Business. – 2019. – No. 3 (48). pp. 255-260.
6. Eliseev, S. A. “Theft of stolen property”: problems of qualification // Criminal law. – 2008. – No. 1. P. 45-49.
7. Kuznetsov, A.P. Problems of technical and legal design of norms providing for liability for theft of property / A. P. Kuznetsov, M. V. Stepanov // Legal technology. – 2013. – No. 7-2. pp. 356-367. – EDN RBRSLP.
8. Lopashenko, N. A. Crimes against property: theory and application. research / ON THE. Lopashenko. – M.: LexEst, 2005. – 408 p.
9. Lyutov, V. A. Comparative analysis of subjective signs of fraud using electronic means of payment in the criminal legislation of Russia and China // International criminal law and international justice. – 2022. – No. 4. – URL: Legal reference system ConsultantPlus.
10. Nazarenko, G. V., Sitnikova, A. I. Crimes against property: scientific and practical. allowance. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2020. – 168 p.
11. Ovsyukov, D. A., Kochoi, S. M. Selfish crimes against property using information and telecommunication networks. Qualification issues: Monograph. – Moscow, 2022 // Legal reference system ConsultantPlus.
12. Sklyarov, S. V. On the issue of competition of norms providing for criminal liability for theft committed from a bank account and fraud using electronic means of payment // Bulletin of the University Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. – 2019. – No. 4 (72). pp. 17-22.
13. Stepanov, M. V. Social and legal conditionality of the criminalization of illegal activities associated with the use of digital financial assets / M. V. Stepanov, A. V. Petryanin // Bulletin of the Kazan Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. – 2020. – T. 11, No. 2(40). pp. 203-212. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37973/KUI.2020.54.49.010. – EDN FCYNTZ.
14. Filippova, L. A. Qualification of thefts / L. A. Filippova. – Text: direct // Young scientist. – 2019. – No. 29 (267). – pp. 121-123. – URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/267/61708/ (date of access: 04/18/2024).
15. Khilyuta, V.V. Establishing signs of the subject of a criminal encroachment in criminal cases of crimes against property // Legality. – 2023. – No. 1. P. 48-50.
16. Chernenko, T. G. On the qualification of crimes in the competition of criminal law norms // Legal problems of strengthening Russian statehood: Coll. Art. Part 47 / Ed. Doctor of Law Science S.A. Eliseeva, Doctor of Law. Sciences L.M. Prozumentova, Doctor of Law. Sciences M.K. Sviridova, Doctor of Law. Sciences V.A. Utkina, Doctor of Law. Sciences O.I. Andreeva, Ph.D. legal Sciences N.S. Jerking. – Tomsk: Publishing house Tom. Univ., 2010. 264. p.
17. Yani, P. S. Questions of qualification of theft of non-cash funds // Legality. – 2022. – No. 1 (1047). pp. 46-50.
18. Yani, P. S. Fraud, covered by a contract, gives rise to a non-contractual obligation // Legality. – 2022. – No. 8. P. 22-27.
