St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Sankt-Peterburg, Russian Federation
UDK 159.9.07 Психологические исследования
Introduction. The procedural approach in the study of a post-penitentiary subject is examined. In the procedural approach the most important is considered to be the analysis of formation, dynamics and novelty of personal entities. The aim of the research is to set the problem of designing a new identity of a post-penitentiary subject, starting from the change of his criminal attitude, constructive experience of guilt and stable reorientation of behaviour to the realisation of values of law-abiding activity. Methods. The dialectical method and the principle of development constituted the research methods. The main methodological approach of the study was the system approach. The study used general scientific research methods aimed at the collection, analysis, systematisation and generalisation of data, in particular, the analysis of normative legal acts and literature references directly related to the study of the problem of designing a new identity of a post-penitentiary subject. Results. The concept of “post-penitentiary ideal of a personality” is defined through the realisation and assumption of guilt for the deed, all responsibility for their future existence and activity. The article considers the problem of self-projecting of an identity of a post-penitentiary personality as an object of legal psychology research, which implies the adaptation of a personality to the “post-violent stage” of its free existence in society. In this case, a new identity, as a result of the post-penitentiary subject’s work over himself, goes beyond the individual self, as it covers broader contexts of a person’s life. Such personal transformations are possible through the introduction of effective psychological practices (correctional programs), self-design and self-development of a post-penitentiary subject. The analysis of foreign experience allowed identifying a number of “effective practices” used by penitentiary psychologists for adults and juveniles.
post-penitentiary subject, probation, personal identity, self-projection, criminal attitudes, guilt
1. Znakov V. V. Samosozidanie cheloveka - novyy etap razvitiya psihologii sub'ekta // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Psihologiya. – 2019. – T. 9, № 2. – S. 112–122; https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.201.
2. Sharanov Yu. A., Zueva E. G. Psihologo-yuridicheskaya dinamika struktury i funkciy viny v processe resheniya postpenitenciarnoy problemy rossiyskogo obschestva // Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel'nyh organah. – 2024. – T. 29, № 1 (96). – S. 6–11; https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-6241-2024-297-000-000
3. Kravec K. V. E. N. Trubeckoy o sootnoshenii prava i nravstvennosti // NOMOTHETIKA : Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. – 2021. – T. 46, № 4. – C. 715–721; https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2021-46-4-715-721.
4. Al'tyusser L. Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva, (zametki dlya issledovaniya) // Neprikosnovennyy zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture. – 2011. – № 3 (77). – S. 14–58.
5. Bovina I. B., Bovin B. G. Normy i ih narushenie: klassicheskie i sovremennye issledovaniya // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psihologiya : elektronnyy zhurnal. – 2021. – T. 10, № 3. – C. 21–31; https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2021100302. – URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/jmfp/archive/2021_n3/jmfp_2021_n3_Bovina_Bovin.pdf.
6. Grishina N. V. «Samoizmeneniya» lichnosti: vozmozhnoe i neobhodimoe // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya i pedagogika. – 2018. – T. 8, vyp. 2. – S. 126–138; https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.202.
7. Sergienko E. A. Sovremennye idei razvitiya v psihologii // Princip razvitiya v sovremennoy psihologii / otv. red. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko. – Moskva: Institut psihologii RAN, 2016. – S. 84–115.
8. Fuko M. Tehnologii sebya / perevod s angl. A. Korbuta // Logos. – 2008. – № 2 (65). – S. 96–122.
9. Chepeleva N. V. Samoproektirovanie lichnosti v diskursivnom prostranstve / Chelovek, sub'ekt, lichnost' v sovremennoy psihologii : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 80‐letiyu A. V. Brushlinskogo, 10–11 oktyabrya 2013 g. : v 3 t. / otv. red. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko. – Moskva: Institut psihologii RAN, 2013. – T. 3. – S. 342–346.
10. Maksimova E. V. Duhovnaya praktika kak predel'naya «Praktika sebya» // Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Yaroslava Mudrogo. – 2013. – T. 1, № 73. – S. 122–125.
11. Sapogova E. E. Zhiznennyy opyt v avtobiograficheskih narrativah lichnosti // Voprosy psihologii. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 68–79.
12. Sarre R. Beyond “What Works?” A 25-year jubilee retrospective of Robert Martinsons famous article // Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. – 2001. – № 34 (1). – P. 38–46; https://doi.org/10.1177/000486580103400103.
13. Cohn A. W. Managing the correctional enterprise – the quest for “what works” // Federal Probation. – 2002. – Vol 66, no 2. – P. 4–9.
14. Stevenson S. F., Hall G., Innes J. Socio-moral reasoning and criminal sentiments in Australian men and women violent offenders and non-offenders // International Journal of Forensic Psychology. – 2003. – Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 111–119.
15. Hvostov A. A. Moral'noe soznanie lichnosti : struktura, genezis, determinanty : monografiya. – Moskva: Prometey, 2005. – 471 s.
16. Boduszek D., Hyland P., Pedziszczak J., Kielkiewicz K. Criminal attitudes, recidivistic behaviour, and the mediating role of associations with criminal friends: an empirical investigation within a prison sample of violent offenders // Europe’s Journal of Psychology. – 2012. – Vol. 8, № 1. – P. 18–31, https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i1.296.
17. Zautorova E. V. Modelirovanie kak metod formirovaniya lichnogo buduschego osuzhdennyh zhenschin // Penitenciarnaya nauka. – 2023. – T. 17, № 4 (64). – S. 451–458; https://doi.org/10.46741/2686-9764.2023.64.4.013.
18. Muhina V. Mezh dvuh ogney: tyuremnyy psiholog // Razvitie lichnosti. – 2007. – № 4. – S. 106–120.
19. Sosnin V. A., Nestik T. A. Sovremennyy terrorizm Social'no psihologicheskiy analiz : monografiya. – Moskva: Institut psihologii RAN, 2008. – 240 s.
20. Oganesyan S. S., Gabaraev A. Sh., Godovanec O. G., Kazberov P. N. [i dr.]. Problemy protivodeystviya religioznomu ekstremizmu i puti formirovaniya veroterpimosti v mestah lisheniya svobody : monografiya. – Moskva: FKU NII FSIN Rossii, 2017. – 167 s.
