from 01.01.2018 until now
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 343.2/.7 Уголовное право
Introduction. The article examines topical issues of the use of weapons and military equipment by police and National Guard officers, as well as officers of the Federal Security Service of Russia and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in the framework of a counter-terrorism operation. The authors come to the conclusion that the norms of the Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism» are inconsistent with each other, as well as with the circumstances excluding the criminality of the act, enshrined in Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and the provisions of other regulatory legal acts regulating the conditions for the legality of causing harm to all persons, regardless of their professional or other special training and official position. According to Part 6 of Article 15 of the Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism», police and officers of the Federal Security Service of Russia and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation officers participating in the counterterrorist operation, use military equipment, weapons and special means (hereinafter – force and weapons) in accordance with the so-called «special legislation» defining the procedure and grounds for the use of force and weapons, which, in turn, enshrines the relevant prohibitions for the use of force and weapons under certain circumstances. And therefore which not any harm caused as a result of the use of force and weapons, can be recognized as legitimate. Nevertheless, according to Article 22 of Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism», any harm caused as a result of the suppression of a terrorist act must be recognized as lawful. It seems that when developing the provisions of the «special legislation», Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism» regarding the use of force and weapons by employees (military personnel) of the above-mentioned law enforcement agencies, the legislator did not take into account the fact that the conditions for the legality of harm must comply with exclusively to the conditions stipulated in the criminal law, and the norms of the «special legislation» and the Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism» in this part cannot contradict them in any way. Thus, the existing inconsistency of the norms of «special legislation» regarding the use of force and weapons by employees of the above-mentioned law enforcement agencies, Part 6 of Article 15, Article 22 of the Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism», as well as Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, affects the legal protection of these employees and may lead to unjustified criminal prosecution of the latter for causing excessive harm while suppressing crimes of a terrorist nature. Research methods: theoretical, statistical, comparative legal, method of formal logic, method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: The authors substantiate the need to amend Article 37 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law «On Countering Terrorism», as well as regulatory legal acts regulating the grounds and procedure for the use of weapons and military equipment by employees (military personnel) of the above-mentioned law enforcement agencies.
necessary defense, legitimacy of necessary defense, counter-terrorist operation, special military operation, terrorist act, crimes of a terrorist nature, use of weapons and military equipment
1. Meyer V. V., Chuykov A. Yu. Kontrterroristicheskaya operaciya kak forma bor'by s terrorizmom // Doneckie chteniya 2017: Russkiy mir kak civilizacionnaya osnova nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo i kul'turnogo razvitiya Donbassa : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferencii studentov i molodyh uchenyh. Posvyaschena 80-letiyu DonNU, Doneck, 17-20 oktyabrya 2017 goda / pod obsch. red. S. V. Bespalovoy. - T. 7. - Doneck: Izdatel'stvo Doneckogo nacional'nogo universiteta, 2017. - S. 148-151.
2. Lucenko V. V. Yuridicheskie predely pravovogo rezhima kontrterroristicheskoy operacii: ponyatiya i vidy // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2021. - T. 7. - № 3-2. - S. 115-119.
3. Milyukov S. F., Nikulenko A. V. Neochevidnye resheniya problem silovogo protivodeystviya prestupnosti // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2021. - T. 15. - № 1. - S. 36-45.
4. Shestakov D. A. Esche raz o prave bezopasnosti v svyazi s pravom protivodeystviya prestupnosti // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. - 2014. - № 1 (32). - S. 13-22.
5. Koreckiy D. A., Milyukov S. F. Vnesudebnaya repressiya kak zakonnyy sposob bor'by s prestupnost'yu // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2004. - № 1. - S. 112-113.
6. Egorova N. A., Egorov A. G. Neobhodimaya oborona v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov policii: voprosy ugolovno-pravovoy ocenki // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 2 (49). - S. 21-32.
7. Chaptykov O. A., Haritonov A. N. Predely neobhodimoy oborony v deyatel'nosti sotrudnikov policii // Forum. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i ekonomicheskie nauki. - 2022. - № 3 (26). - S. 136-144.
8. Zarechnev D. O., Levchenko A. A., Fedulov B. A. Osobennosti pravovogo obespecheniya lichnoy bezopasnosti sotrudnikov policii pri vypolnenii sluzhebno-boevyh zadach // Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2020. - № 1 (29). - S. 32-35.
9. Pobegaylo E. F. Izbrannye trudy. Acsoc. yuridicheskiy centr. - Sankt-Peterburg: Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2008. - 1064 s.
10. Parhomenko S. V. Zakonodatel'naya reglamentaciya neobhodimoy oborony: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Nauchnoe nasledie irkutskih uchenyh ugolovno-pravovoy nauki : materialy Nacional'noy nauchno-issledovatel'skoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya zasluzhennogo yurista Rossiyskoy Federacii, doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora G. S. Gaverova i doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora V. Ya. Rybal'skoy, Irkutsk, 12 iyunya 2021 goda. - Irkutsk: Baykal'skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2021. - S. 72-76.
11. Parhomenko S. V. K voprosu o teoreticheskih osnovah reglamentacii neobhodimoy oborony v ugolovnom zakonodatel'stve // Prolog: zhurnal o prave. - 2021. - № 3 (31). - S. 92-99.
12. Nagornyy A. P. Problemy kvalifikacii neobhodimoy oborony v Rossii // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2022. - T. 8. - № 3. - S. 336-341.
13. Budag'yanc G. N., Kondrashov A. V. Ugolovno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnika policii za nepravomernoe primenenie fizicheskoy sily, special'nyh sredstv i ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2022. - T. 8. - № 1. - S. 92-96.
14. Sidorov E. T. Problemy primeneniya boevoy i special'noy tehniki podrazdeleniyami MVD Rossii i Vooruzhennyh Sil Rossii pri provedenii kontrterroristicheskoy operacii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2017. - № 1. - S. 17-28.
15. Milyukov S. F., Nikulenko A. V. Deviantnoe povedenie sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del: opyt dialekticheskoy ocenki // Rossiyskiy deviantologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2021. - № 1 (1). - S. 151-163.
