employee
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 343 Уголовное право. Уголовное судопроизводство. Криминология. Криминалистика
This article discusses the determinants of organized crime and measures to prevent it. To date, the need to implement comprehensive measures aimed at preventing organized crime is obvious. This is pointed out by many experts, including those in the field of criminological science. The paper analyzes various points of view of legal scholars on this topic with the presentation of alternative views of representatives of criminological science on the designated problem. The authors focuses on a comparative analysis of organized crime statistics from 2018 to the present.This is especially true when the development of rule-making activity in connection with the demands of the Russian society and global trends reaches a new level and many controversial situations arise. Based on a comparative analysis, the article attempts to streamline the author’s and scientific positions on the prevention of organized crime. The author’s opinion is substantiated on the issue of the relationship between the actual causes and conditions of organized crime and the prevention of this type of crime, conclusions are drawn regarding the prospects for the development of the institutions under consideration for criminological science.
organized crime, determinants, prevention, law enforcement agencies, criminology, prevention, crime, statistics, criminal activity
1. Abaeva F. V. Harakteristika lichnosti lidera organizovannoy prestupnosti // Naukosfera. - 2021. - № 9-2. - S. 113-116.
2. Asatryan H. A., Hristyuk A. A. Harakteristika lichnosti prestupnika, zanimayuschegosya organizovannoy prestupnoy deyatel'nost'yu // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. -2014. - № 3. - S. 40-48.
3. Bytko S. Yu. Recidiv prestupleniy v ryadu determinant organizovannoy prestupnosti / Bor'ba s organizovannymi proyavleniyami prestupnosti i obespechenie nacional'noy bezopasnosti : tezisy doklada konferencii. - Moskva: Obscherossiyskaya obschestvennaya organizaciya «Rossiyskaya kriminologicheskaya associaciya», 2019. - S. 126-131.
4. Bogdanov A. V., Il'inskiy I. I., Hazov E. N. Ekstremistskaya sreda - resursnaya baza terrorizma // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 188-194.
5. Bondar' M. M., Zhukova S. S. COVID-19 kak determinanta razvitiya organizovannoy prestupnosti // Obschestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo. - 2020. - № 12 (89). - S. 119-123.
6. Vakulenko N. A. Harakternye kriminologicheskie osobennosti lichnosti lidera prestupnoy gruppy // Yurist'-Pravoved'. - 2021. -№ 3 (98). - S. 80-85.
7. Kozodaeva O. N., Yur'ev I. A. «Belovorotnichkovaya prestupnost'» v usloviyah sovremennoy rossiyskoy kriminogennoy obstanovki: kriminologicheskiy aspekt / Stanovlenie i razvitie professii yurista: nasledie pokoleniy (pamyati yuristov-frontovikov posvyaschaetsya) : sbornik trudov konferencii / otv. redaktor O. V. Moiseeva. - Tambov: Izdatel'skiy dom «Derzhavinskiy», 2021. - S. 267-272.
8. Staroverov A. V. K voprosu o ponyatii organizovannoy prestupnosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2017. - № 1. - S. 171-173.
9. Sevast'yanov D. L. Lichnost' organizovannogo prestupnika (st. 210 UK RF) // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie. - 2020. - № 4 (79). - S. 96-99.
10. Legotina U. S. Determinaciya formirovaniya organizovannyh prestupnyh grupp v penitenciarnyh uchrezhdeniyah // Yuridicheskiy fakt. - 2020. - № 83. - S. 53-55.
11. Madzhidzoda D. Z. Organizovannaya prestupnost' gosudarstv - uchastnikov SNG: prichiny, usloviya i faktory // Vestnik tadzhikskogo nacional'nogo universiteta. Seriya social'no-ekonomicheskih i obschestvennyh nauk. - 2017. - № 2/10. - S. 182-191.
12. Maystrenko G. A. Determinanty i osnovnye priznaki rossiyskoy organizovannoy prestupnosti // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2020. - T. 10. - № 10-1. - S. 113-118.
13. Obolenskiy Yu. B. Voprosy protivodeystviya organizovannoy prestupnosti // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2021.- № 2. - S. 281-285.
14. Plotnikova T. V., Kotel'nikova O. V. Fenomen kiberprestupnosti v usloviyah XXI veka // Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost'. - 2020. - № 3 (12). - S. 141-150.
15. Tailova A. G., Abdullaeva U. A. Specifika determinacii i prichinnosti vooruzhennoy organizovannoy prestupnosti / Nauka segodnya: istoriya i sovremennost' : materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii: v 2 chastyah. - Vologda: OOO «Marker», 2016. - S. 57-58.
16. Hristyuk A. A. Ponyatie i priznaki organizovannoy prestupnosti. Organizovannaya prestupnaya deyatel'nost' // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2010. - № 335. - S. 109-112.
17. Chechenov A. M. Harakteristika lichnosti chlenov organizovannyh prestupnyh grupp // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. - 2015. - № 19. - S. 101-103.
18. Yahontova O. S. Osobennosti preventivnoy deyatel'nosti OVD v migracionnoy srede / Deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennih dela po protivodeystviyu kriminal'nym proyavleniyam v migracionnoy srede : materialy vnutrivedomstvennogo kruglogo stola Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2020. - S. 304-307.
19. Yahontov R. N. Otdel'nye aspekty upravleniya deyatel'nost'yu organov vnutrennih del po profilaktike prestupnosti / Sistema profilaktiki prestupnosti: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya : sbornik trudov konferencii. - Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii, 2015. - S. 159-162.
