from 01.01.2012 to 01.01.2019
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.85 Криминалистика
BBK 6752 Криминалистика
TBK 700 Общие вопросы
The article deals with issues relating to the implementation, in theory and practice, of the “complete prohibition” as the mean of legal regulation used within operational-search activity. The legislator introduced this mechanism in the framework of the Russian President’s initiatives on capital amnesty and relevant solutions aimed to ensure legal protection of private property interests of those who take part in voluntary disclosure of assets, of their confidential information, and to guarantee their exemption from criminal, administrative and tax liabilities. The issues covered by the article are analyzed basing on theoretical surveys on operational-search activity, as well as on their current regulatory framework and related corresponding criminal sciences. The article specifies and classifies provisions of the complete prohibition of operational-search activity in respect of the considered categories of individuals. In conclusion, the practical challenges of this legal regulation mechanism are examined and the ways to tackle them are suggested.
operational-search activity, operational-search measures, complete prohibition, capital amnesty, tax crime, special tax declaration, reversal of the tax base, human rights, operational-search immunity
1. Nurmagambetov R. G. Konstitucionno-pravovye zaprety, ogranicheniya i dozvoleniya kak sposoby pravovogo regulirovaniya obschestvennyh otnosheniy // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». - 2007. - № 12 (90). - S. 71-78.
2. Golovkin R. B. Nekotorye aspekty ogranicheniya ogranicheniy v prave // Yuridicheskaya tehnika. - 2018. - № 12. - S. 127-132.
3. Mal'ko A. V. Zaprety kak sredstvo pravovoy politiki // Vestnik Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Pravo». - 2012. - № 1 (11). - S. 3-11.
4. Alekseev S. S. Obschie dozvoleniya i obschie zaprety v sovetskom prave. - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1989. - 288 s.
5. Pastuhov I. [i dr.]. Delo V. Izraylita: polnaya amnistiya // Zakon. - 2019. - № 11. - S. 31-38.
6. Chechetin A. E. Obespechenie prav lichnosti pri provedenii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy : monografiya. - Sankt-Peterburg: Izd-vo SPb un-ta MVD Rossii, 2016. - 232 s.
7. Minyazeva T. F., Serebrennikova A. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic v Rossii i Germanii: k postanovke problemy // Lex russica (Russkiy zakon). - 2017. - № 2 (123). - S. 147-154.
8. Kol'cov D. V. Glasnost' i neglasnost' kak kriterii klassifikacii operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy (nauchnaya stat'ya) / Sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii «Aktual'nye problemy nauki i praktiki: Gatchinskie chteniya - 2019». 17-18 maya 2019 g. - Gatchina: Izd-vo Gosudarstvennogo instituta ekonomiki, finansov, prava i tehnologiy, 2019. - S. 336-338.
9. Lavrent'ev V. A. Ispol'zovanie komparativistskogo podhoda pri izuchenii immunitetov v operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ih resheniya. - 2018. - № 2 (20). - S. 117-121.
10. Lugovik V. F. Operativno-rozysknoy immunitet: problemy ispol'zovaniya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Operativno-rozysknoe pravo. - 2020. - № 1. - S. 3-5.
11. Baklanov L. A., Panyushin D. B. Provedenie glasnogo obsledovaniya zhilischa bez soglasiya ego sobstvennikov: Pro et contra // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2018. № 2 (45). - S. 78-84.
