St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.17 Административное право
According to the current legislation, employees of internal Affairs bodies may be brought to administrative responsibility for committing an administrative offense on a General basis, or to disciplinary responsibility. Each type of responsibility has its own procedural form of implementation: proceedings in the case of an administrative offense, or proceedings in a disciplinary case. This raises a question of both theoretical and practical significance about, the correlation of these procedural forms when bringing employees of internal Affairs bodies to disciplinary responsibility for committing an administrative offense. In the article based on the theory of the administrative process, the list of procedural actions in proceedings on cases of administrative offences and proceedings in disciplinary cases, when you initiate disciplinary proceedings upon the Commission by the employee of internal Affairs bodies administrative offense. Analysis of the legislation on administrative offenses and legislation on service in the internal Affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, materials of disciplinary and judicial practice, modern scientific research on issues related to bringing employees of internal Affairs bodies to disciplinary responsibility for committing administrative offenses, allowed us to reveal the content of the stage of initiation in disciplinary cases of this category, to formulate proposals for improving the legal norms governing individual procedural actions, taking into account the prospects for the adoption of the draft Procedural code of the Russian Federation on administrative offences.
administrative offense, disciplinary responsibility, proceedings in a disciplinary case, the stage of initiation
1. Rogozhkina E. A. Proizvodstvo po disciplinarnym delam kak forma realizacii disciplinarnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennyh sluzhaschih // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 2017. - № 8. - S. 96-99.
2. Mel'nikov V. A. Processual'noe oformlenie materialov po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, za sovershenie kotoryh sotrudniki organov vnutrennih del nesut disciplinarnuyu otvetstvennost' // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2014. - № 4 (31). - S. 20-23.
3. Mal'cev E. P. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva o disciplinarnom prinuzhdenii v sisteme organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii // Molodoy uchenyy. - 2012. - № 11. - S. 302-304.
4. Vitovskaya E. S. Nalozhenie disciplinarnoy otvetstvennosti za administrativnye pravonarusheniya na sotrudnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. - 2012. - № 1 (9). - S. 30-38.
5. Malyhina T. A. Sochetanie disciplinarnoy i administrativnoy otvetstvennosti sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. - Seriya «Ekonomika i pravo». - 2015. - T. 25. - № 6. - S. 154-159.
6. Elfimova E. V., Korkin A. V. Administrativnoe pravonarushenie kak prostupok, porochaschiy chest' sotrudnika organov vnutrennih del // Vestnik Ural'skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2016. - № 3. - S. 2-6.
7. Ravnyushkin A. V. Uvol'nenie so sluzhby v organah vnutrennih del v svyazi s soversheniem prostupka, porochaschego chest' sotrudnika organov vnutrennih del, pri sovershenii administrativnogo pravonarusheniya // Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik. - 2015. - № 3 (11). - S. 72-76.
8. Mahaeva L. G. Problemnye voprosy uvol'neniya sotrudnikov organov vnutrennih del, svyazannye s narusheniem professional'no-eticheskih norm // Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2017. - № 2. - S. 158-159.
