Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
Relevance of the research: In the Russian Federation a temporary suspension from work is provided as a measure of procedural coercion. Many theoretical and practical aspects of the application of this measure have not been fully explored, which complicates law enforcement practice and creates the prerequisites for violating its uniformity.Formulation of the problem: In the science a consensus has not been reached on subjects that may be removed from work. The correlation of temporary dismissal from work as a measure of procedural coercion with dismissal, carried out in a departmental manner. The law does not highlight the grounds for this coercive measure, does not specify the procedure for its election. There are no grounds for canceling a temporary suspension. Objectives and research methods: The aim of the study is to develop an optimal algorithm for applying temporary dismissal from work as a measure of procedural coercion, to determine the circle of subjects to which this measure is applied, to clarify the procedural order of its application, to formulate the grounds for canceling temporary suspension from work. In the work, the method of dialectical materialism was used, which involves the study of phenomena taking into account mutual relations and dependencies. Methods such as formal legal, analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction were also used. Results and key findings: The correlation of the criminal procedure and the “departmental” dismissal is carried out. The grounds for applying this coercive measure are data on the person’s ability to continue to engage in criminal activity and oppose the investigation and judicial examination of the case while on work. Suspension may apply not only to officials, but to any employees, except for deputies and judges. The procedure for suspension from work is generally identical to the procedure for detention. At the hearing, the presence of the accused (suspect) must be ensured.
criminal proceedings; preliminary investigation; state coercion; enforcement measures; suspension from work
1. Bikmiev R. G. K voprosu o procedure razresheniya sudom hodataystva o vremennom otstranenii ot dolzhnosti // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. - 2011. - № 4. - S. 169-173.
2. Bikmiev R. G. Osnovaniya primeneniya vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. - 2012. - № 1 (21). - S. 257-261.
3. Bikmiev R. G. Sroki primeneniya mery processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v vide vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti // Vestnik TISBI. - 2012. - № 3. - S. 167-173.
4. Gaponova V. N. Osnovaniya i celi vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti v ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2015. - № 2 (31). - S. 17-23.
5. Zheltobryuhov S. P. Vremennoe otstranenie podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) ot zanimaemoy dolzhnosti // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 2012. - № 9. - S. 35-39.
6. Kolokolov N. A. Vremennoe otstranenie ot dolzhnosti: kriterii zakonnosti i obosnovannosti sudebnogo resheniya // Ugolovnyy process. - 2014. - № 12 (120). - S. 48-57.
7. Kolokolov N. A. Vremennoe otstranenie ot dolzhnosti: algoritm processual'nogo deystviya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. - 2010. - № 17. - S. 6-8.
8. Kolokolov N. A. Vremennoe otstranenie ot dolzhnosti (st. 114 UPK RF) // Yuridicheskiy mir. - 2010. - № 7. - S. 50-51.
9. Kutuev E. K., Kudrina E. V. Problemy primeneniya mery prinuzhdeniya v vide vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti // Vestnik Akademii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. - 2010. - № 9. - S. 85-88.
10. Marficin P. G., Gaponova V. N. Vremennoe otstranenie podozrevaemogo ili obvinyaemogo ot dolzhnosti i ego al'ternativy // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2015. - № 2. - S. 20-25.
11. Neretin N. N. Spornye momenty primeneniya mery processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v vide vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti // Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom. - 2012. - № 1. - S. 41-43.
12. Privetova M. G. Vremennoe otstranenie ot dolzhnosti kak mera processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya // Trudy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Nadezhnost' i kachestvo» . - 2005. - T. 1. - S. 455-458.
13. Suholenko E. A. Processual'nyy poryadok vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti obvinyaemyh v prestupleniyah korrupcionnogo haraktera // Yurist'-Pravoved'. - 2014. - № 6 (67). - S. 84-87.
14. Tensina E. F., Tat'yanina L. G. K voprosu o primenenii vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti po UPK RF // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 201-203.
15. Schenina T. E. Nekotorye problemy primeneniya vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti v sfere obrazovaniya // Vestnik razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. - 2013. - № 5. - S. 51-53.
16. Magomedov Sh. M. Vremennoe otstranenie ot dolzhnosti v ugolovnom processe // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. - 2019. - № 1-1. - S. 245-252.
17. Bagautdinov F. N. Vremennoe otstranenie obvinyaemogo ot dolzhnosti // Zakonnost'. - 2003. - № 4. - S. 13-16.
18. Garaeva T. B. Osnovaniya primeneniya mery processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v vide vremennogo otstraneniya ot dolzhnosti // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. - 2019. - № 5 (173). - S. 92-95.
