Saratov State Law Academy (doktorantura, doktorant)
Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.07 Теория государства и права
Introduction. The article is devoted to the general theoretic analysis of legal category “privilege”. The author proposes and argues the hypothesis of the perception of privilege as a form of legal advantage different from such types of this system as courtesy and immunity. The work presents essential and substantial consideration of legal privilege from the point of view of the doctrine of law, historical and modern legislation, as well as law enforcement practice. The aim is to form a view of privilege as a form of improving the legal situation of individual entities with special legal status; to propose its definition. Methodology. Historical learning style, empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Specific scientific methods: technical approach, method of interpretation of legal norms. Results. Analysis of doctrinal sources of Russian and foreign law, historical monuments of jurisprudence, modern normative legal acts and law enforcement practice has shown thatthe category of privilege is often mixed with other legal means, having an incentive or rewarding character. On the basis of the establishment of similarity and distinction elements between privilege, courtesy and immunity, aspects of their interaction and existing contradictions, the author proves the independent categorical nature of privilege, identifies its specific features, which differ from related legal phenomena. Conclusion. In both legal science (theoretical and sectoral) and the system of legislation, it is necessary to clearly distinguish the understanding and application of the legal category “privilege” by means of: establishing legal definition, unification and specifying the provisions of normative acts using backing, incentive and rewarding instrumentarium; achieving the justifiable use of evaluation categories giving the right to the privilege. The actions taken should contribute not only to improving the efficiency of public relations regulation due to the legal advantages system, but also to reducing the corruption risks associated with the granting of such “on top of ” rights, diminishing administrative barriers on receipt and realization.
legal preference, privilege, courtesy (exemption), incentive, rewarding
1. Savushkina Yu. V. Istoricheskie aspekty razvitiya instituta pravovyh privilegiy // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta. - 2017. - № 1 (30). - S. 137-142.
2. Afanas'eva V. I. Privilegiya, patent, avtorskoe svidetel'stvo v Rossii : monografiya / 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2012. - 320 s.
3. Mal'ko A. V., Morozova I. S. L'goty v rossiyskom prave (Problemy teorii i praktiki) : monografiya. - Saratov: Izd-vo GOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava», 2004. - 276 s.
4. Starilov Yu. N. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba v Rossiyskoy Federacii : Teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie. - Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta, 1996. - 556 s.
5. Arutyunyan D. G. Privilegii i immunitety General'nogo sekretarya OON // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2007. - № 1. - S. 58-63.
6. Anohin Yu. V. O realizacii principa ravnoy obyazatel'nosti zakona v sisteme rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva / Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupleniyami i inymi pravonarusheniyami : materialy shestnadcatoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii / pod red. Yu. V. Anohina. - Ch. 2. - Barnaul: Barnaul'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2018. - S. 209-210.
7. Dyuryagin I. Ya. Grazhdanin i zakon (O zaschite prav i zakonnyh interesov grazhdan). - Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1989. - 384 s.
8. Mal'ko A. V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie. - 1998. - № 3 (222). - S. 134-147.
9. Yeriomina K. Diplomatic immunity: privilege or impunity? // Mіzhnarodniy naukoviy zhurnal «Іnternauka». - 2017. - T. 2. - № 18 (40). - S. 92-94.
10. Istomenok K. V. Funkcii diplomaticheskogo kur'era. Privilegii i immunitety diplomaticheskogo kur'era // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2008. - № 2. - S. 273-280.
11. Soprun T., Kalinichenko A. Compliance of ukrainian national legislation with european standards about vacation privilege // Mіzhnarodniy naukoviy zhurnal «Іnternauka». Serіya: Yuridichnі nauki. - 2017. - № 4 (4). - S. 61-63.
12. Bondar' N. S., Kapranova Yu. V. Konstitucionnoe izmerenie ravnopraviya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federacii. - Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rost. gos. un-ta, 2002. - 192 s.
13. Khlystova N. B. To the question on the criminal protection of an attorney client privilege // Modern Science. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 96-99.
14. Yemelyanov A., Larina O. Privileges as a regulator of social and economic relations in european states in XIX century // Ekonomichniy chasopis-XXI. - 2017. - № 1-2 (163). - S. 10-13.
15. Belyaeva G. S. Pravovoy rezhim v obscheteoreticheskom izmerenii: monografiya. - Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2013. - 240 s.
16. Sidorova N. V. Privilegiya protiv samoobvineniya i dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie pokazaniy, poluchennyh v rezul'tate soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. - 2010. - № 2 (12). - S. 89-94.
17. Taranova T. Privilegii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. - 2006. - № 10. - S. 24-28.
18. Agishev S. Yu. Privilegiya norvezhskogo korolya Hakona V gorodu Gamburgu iz sobraniya nauchnoy biblioteki Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2019. - № 441. - S. 142-150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/441/18.
