The article raises the problem of developing criteria for assessing the sufficiency of evidence within the framework of pre-trial criminal proceedings. It is noted that neither legislative nor uniform doctrinal definition of such criteria exists. Various scientific approaches to this problem are analyzed. The author's conclusion about the criteria for assessing the sufficiency of evidence is formulated.
Criminal proceedings, evidence, sufficiency of evidence, assessment of evidence, criteria for assessing the sufficiency of evidence, internal conviction, standards of proof, relevance, admissibility, reliability of evidence
1. Aleksandrov A.S. «Pohvala» teorii formal'nyh dokazatel'stv // Pravovedenie. 2002. № 4 (243). S. 31-35.
2. Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom processe / Otv. red. N.V. ZHogin, izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1973.
3. Voznyuk E.P. «Standarty dokazyvaniya» v rossijskoj pravovoj sisteme // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo rossijskogo gosudarstva i prava. Materialy ezhegodnoj vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Kaliningrad: KF SPbU MVD Rossii, 2022. S. 24-29.
4. Skabelin S.I. Sootnoshenie ponyatij «dostatochnye dannye» i «dostatochnye dokazatel'stva» v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2014. № 8 (45). S. 1750-1754.
5. Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom processe. M., 2012.
